Yes! With a black budget of endless dollars they funded Yale to study/engineer a PR program to combat vaxxine hesitancy with a propaganda campaign that rolled out globally (don't kill grandma, we're in this together, social media badges, etc).
This label could apply to most of the prominent members of the MFM. I donтАЩt know about you, but in the past couple of monthsтАж.a lead pack is breaking away as if they are in the final lap of the Kentucky Derby.
Meanwhile, some of the foot soldiers keep soldering inтАжtheir voices being drown out as many in the MFM clamor for the elevation of a certain few to hero status.
Should give everyone pauseтАжare we about to be sold on a тАЬsolutionтАЭ that isnтАЩt really about fixing the underlying problem but is more about creating the exit ramp for the COVID chronicles so that the agenda of the MWO can move forward.
A few in the MFM need to be more discerning themselves about who they associate withтАФ-or not, the reality is no trust should remain at this point for any of these guys, even the supposed heroes that are going to deliver us. ЁЯЩД
I think that 'solution selling' is mostly a product of a sales-oriented culture. Which, in turn, is a product of the missionary culture. In my opinion, one of the most brilliant frameworks of looking at the great reset and the digital enslavement is Steven Newcomb's. https://tessa.substack.com/p/how-domination-drives-genocides
Is is t a very popular framework though? No, not at the moment, because it throws away all talking points and forces honesty. And that is the reason why I personally care a lot less about people's "ideas" or "opinions" than their actions, whether their actions are toward love and healing and happy humility, or toward partisan divisions, the word "partisan" being used broadly here.
If those are your criteria....like Tereza, I canтАЩt understand your defense of RM.
And, you know, as I reached out to you privately...I have my own concerns about those within the MFM rabid defense of him (RM) while also refusing to be honest and engage in discussions that broaden the scope of the resistance to really examine elements that are about more than the vaccine. But alas, they mostly beat one drum and only one drum on their terms while ignoring the underlying process that shifts the financial markets and turns us into commodities. But again, when and if that comes to pass....where will those standing against the vaccine stand? Do they understand the bigger picture? Do they willfully ignore it or refuse yo enlighten the masses because they want it as an option for themselves in reserve? That is a legitimate question that needs to be explored....not treated as some slanderous remark. Seriously, we are either fighting for humanity or we are participating in political theatre.
My defense is of fairness and intellectual integrity. I believe he is being set up, just like his rivals are. And we all lose from it. It has nothing to do with perfection, or character flaws, or who took tor didn't take he jab, etc There are many forces at play, and I don't like the sacrifice of the innocent, even if the innocent are imperfect. I also don't like it when people's potential for doing good is curbed in front of us, and even with some sincerely cheering.. I am cool with people liking or disliking whomever they want, it's a matter of free will choice. And surely, most people are extremely imperfect. But I feel obliged to act on what i think is going on, which is not always what it seems to be. And then everyone can decide.
Fair enough. For me, when he chose to attack me and go on about my supposed тАЬvicious attacksтАЭ and claimed or suggested that I was some how blackmailing himтАж.really?!?! He is a problem, I donтАЩt care on whose damn side he is. He needs either to get over himself and not expected people to just fawn over him. I am quick to give people the benefit of the doubt, but I have also learned to recognize that when people strike out like that it is because they feel cornered.
I was not cornering himтАжbut the fact he perceived it that way and attacked me in responseтАжin the way he didтАж.a couple of things come to mindтАж.1) he was cornered because he did not want to answer the question and IтАЩd note, the answer he gave was a non-answer relative to my point/question of him; and 2) he was not cornered but is a narcissist that lacks self awareness.
I also found it troubling that his reply suggested he had been stalking my comments. That just plain gave me the creeps because he only ever replied to one or two of my comments. And Nass did the same routine. Interestingly, she went and testified, like me, regarding COVID legislation (which Ivam grateful for) тАжbut unlike me, she did not point to the elephant in the room! That is the globalist in our state who is building a biopharmaceutical corridor with the likes of Gates. Still left wondering why she refuses to name names of those doing the dirty deeds in her backyard. Guess it is easier to stay above the fray and have notoriety than have skin in the game at a local level.
Maybe that is not fair and some will perceive my comment as unkind or ungrateful. I am left wondering though why one would not name names when so much is at stake?
I notice how it is ok to name certain names тАж.Gate, Schwaub, Soros, etc. but the reality is there are plenty doing their bidding or working the agenda under radar in our neighborhoods, cities, statesтАж.we need to start naming names and exposing the game at that level or the resistance goes no where. The big names at the top have protection and they know it. It is the proxies working the plan that once called forward to account that will have to chooseтАж.loyalty to the agenda and the fin/tech elite bosses with a price to be paid or perhaps rethinking their actions because their friends and neighbors now know they are a wolf in sheepтАЩs clothing. Such are the predatory philanthropists.
Laura, I tried to respond to your comment the other day but Substack ate it and it was too long to retype, so here is the gist.
I don't know what happened in Robert's threads. If you were consistently nuanced, benevolent, respectful, not accusatory, not trying to grill him like he is a potential criminal or twist his arm, and he snapped at you out of the blue, then he is responsible for his lack of constraint, and I am sorry you found yourself on the receiving end of an internet conversation gone south. Since I don't know how the thread went, I cant say that I side with you or with Robert, I presume you were both sincere and it was of those things on the internet that spin out of proportion.
I can tell you that on my end, I usually ignore such things and forget about it immediately. One particular smart person blocked me based on that person's internal dynamic, after being rude to me on my own page, and I happily forgot about that person's existence, and I don't even have hard feelings. I truly don't care. Mind you, I also don't feel any urge to go around and criticize because honestly, the world is full of people acting on bad habits so who cares.
As far as Meryl, I love her. She is a human being of great courage and integrity, and I stand by her. She has done more for the world than many, and deserves a ton of gratitude and admiration.
Again, the devil is in the detail (and I don't know the detail) but every human being, including you, Meryl, Robert, Ginger, Peter, and everyone else, is entitled to selecting the areas of work on which we focus based on internal preference alone. That's a sacred part of life. And time is limited, so we all spend it where we want to spend it. So suspecting people based on the fact that they are not a clone of you (abstract you), your preferences and priorities, is a certain recipe for never leaving the state of feeling tragically underappreciated, and that's a miserable state.
My own philosophy is that if I feel like something needs to be done and no one's doing it, well, maybe then I should do it. It takes as much time to do that than to complain about others not doing it. And then I can feel at peace and bring my work to the world and seek dialogue from a place of love, confidence, and peace. But in any case, Meryl is one stunning human being with a great heart, and i don't want to see her name in the light of suspicion, she doesn't deserve it.
There are sacred things in life, goodness and courage are one of those, and I find it far more useful to support the people who do good work even if I don't agree with them on 100% of things (this is my general philosophy that works for me, you obviously are not me and you do what you like to do, etc.)
And also, I personally don't get mad at people if I have a theory that to me feels very important, and they don't pay attention, or disagree, etc It is possible to care passionately about something and not get mad at other for not caring about it! Perhaps it is one of the things we all need to learn at one point in life... it certainly was a useful discovery in my own life when I figured that out.
Perhaps I was influenced by the old art critic joke. As an artist, it reflects how I feel about life in general. :)
And truly, if Robert answered to only two of your comments and you are complaining, I don't think he answered to more than one comment by me (maybe two :), so.... you can imagine what it is like to get hundreds of comments, one cannot physically respond to every comment and stay sane and actually also do other things, like live in the physical world. People who have the time to be super active in comments either sit on their computer all day and work comments in cold blood as a marketing tool (I've worked in marketing and I know industry standards, that is the cynical reality:), or have a team of people working for them behind the scenes. There is no other way. No normal person has the time to hover every comment. Doesn't happen. Comments are meant to be a community of many people!!
Like, for example, this one took me probably an hour because I had to think it though. How many hours are there in a day? See?
Was I rude to him? NO, I asked a naive question about the mrna. I was truly unaware of all that's going on behind the scenes, and I trusted him. I asked in good faith. He called me a troll. I was like, Oh. My. God. He treats you nice tessa lena because you have influence. I am a nobody.
Only those who think they are above reproach or better than others resort to the tactics you describe and I experienced.
It is not ok. And only leads to more questions not the supposed unity that they keep insisting is essential.
I called Meryl out on her need to claim that she broke some fact or story before Karen Kingston. In my view, it was more about Meryl insisting that Karen Kingston was trying to step some standing it accolade that belonged to her. I basically said isnтАЩt what matters is the truth was now out there and questioned the need for some to be constantly jockeying for being the тАЬheroesтАЭ or latest set of тАЬexpertsтАЭ even as they bemoan the splintering of the MFM. She called me a fragger and was not nice about it.
She insisted it did matter who broke the news first. Really? Why? Sorry, but over time I have begun to see some have egos as big as Fauci and I personally have no desire to be beholden to them than I want to be beholden to Fauci.
As for bowing down and being so grateful and gracious about all they are doing for us. What? Seriously, I just canтАЩt even get on board at this point with that kind of hero worshipтАж.many in the MFM participated in this predatory system for yearsтАж.I stood up before they did.
So NO they do not get some loyalty for being on a national or global stage asserting themselves, especially when I have been in the trenches fighting with all I have for the little guy and then get called a fragger because I donтАЩt think the resistance should be about getting тАЬcredit.тАЭ
At this point, I have come to see the substack community as a silo into itself where the needle isnтАЩt being moved with regard to where it will make a differenceтАж.in the trenches.
As to TessтАЩ pointтАж.I am doing day in and day out what I feel needs to be done. And I will not apologize for noting that some in the MFM refuse (to use their platform) to get their hands dirty in a way in the trenches that might ultimately make a difference. The globalists are busy controlling my state and it sure feels like some refuse to actually name names. Why?
For what itтАЩs worthтАжI went to the public hearing in my state and named namesтАж.but I guess I can do that because IтАЩm not part of the industry or peer group we are supposedly fighting.
Everybody may have the right to ask questions but everybody also has the responsibility to first and foremost, curb their own ego and not allow one's own self-righteousness (something that I am sure we all have to some degree) to get ahead of us, I remember that article by Meryl. She was 100% spot on in it. And she was also fair. On a side note, I am personally not subscribed to the genre of "calling out," by which I mean I don't engage in endless purity test back and forth threads, and I consider them extremely unhelpful. So My take on this is in principle different from yours. Cancel culture and its tool of "calling people out" is the last thing we need if we want to defeat Klaus Schwab, in my opinion.
Interesting put-down, fragging. I read an article on fragging in the Vietnam war. Soldiers would frag their superior officers. Colin Powell called it "attacks on authority." If there's anything authoritarians hate, it's attacks on their authority. Nass took your disagreement as a murderous attack. She needs to get over herself.
Laura - He did that to me, too. I was shocked and dismayed at first. Then it gradually dawned on me that that's what liars and abusers do to deflect. I know from experience. Then I started checking out what other people, like you, have been saying.
Thank you, Tony!! They also have individuals working for them who say all the right things and use marketing very skillfully!!
Yes! With a black budget of endless dollars they funded Yale to study/engineer a PR program to combat vaxxine hesitancy with a propaganda campaign that rolled out globally (don't kill grandma, we're in this together, social media badges, etc).
This label could apply to most of the prominent members of the MFM. I donтАЩt know about you, but in the past couple of monthsтАж.a lead pack is breaking away as if they are in the final lap of the Kentucky Derby.
Meanwhile, some of the foot soldiers keep soldering inтАжtheir voices being drown out as many in the MFM clamor for the elevation of a certain few to hero status.
Should give everyone pauseтАжare we about to be sold on a тАЬsolutionтАЭ that isnтАЩt really about fixing the underlying problem but is more about creating the exit ramp for the COVID chronicles so that the agenda of the MWO can move forward.
A few in the MFM need to be more discerning themselves about who they associate withтАФ-or not, the reality is no trust should remain at this point for any of these guys, even the supposed heroes that are going to deliver us. ЁЯЩД
I think that 'solution selling' is mostly a product of a sales-oriented culture. Which, in turn, is a product of the missionary culture. In my opinion, one of the most brilliant frameworks of looking at the great reset and the digital enslavement is Steven Newcomb's. https://tessa.substack.com/p/how-domination-drives-genocides
Is is t a very popular framework though? No, not at the moment, because it throws away all talking points and forces honesty. And that is the reason why I personally care a lot less about people's "ideas" or "opinions" than their actions, whether their actions are toward love and healing and happy humility, or toward partisan divisions, the word "partisan" being used broadly here.
If those are your criteria....like Tereza, I canтАЩt understand your defense of RM.
And, you know, as I reached out to you privately...I have my own concerns about those within the MFM rabid defense of him (RM) while also refusing to be honest and engage in discussions that broaden the scope of the resistance to really examine elements that are about more than the vaccine. But alas, they mostly beat one drum and only one drum on their terms while ignoring the underlying process that shifts the financial markets and turns us into commodities. But again, when and if that comes to pass....where will those standing against the vaccine stand? Do they understand the bigger picture? Do they willfully ignore it or refuse yo enlighten the masses because they want it as an option for themselves in reserve? That is a legitimate question that needs to be explored....not treated as some slanderous remark. Seriously, we are either fighting for humanity or we are participating in political theatre.
My defense is of fairness and intellectual integrity. I believe he is being set up, just like his rivals are. And we all lose from it. It has nothing to do with perfection, or character flaws, or who took tor didn't take he jab, etc There are many forces at play, and I don't like the sacrifice of the innocent, even if the innocent are imperfect. I also don't like it when people's potential for doing good is curbed in front of us, and even with some sincerely cheering.. I am cool with people liking or disliking whomever they want, it's a matter of free will choice. And surely, most people are extremely imperfect. But I feel obliged to act on what i think is going on, which is not always what it seems to be. And then everyone can decide.
Fair enough. For me, when he chose to attack me and go on about my supposed тАЬvicious attacksтАЭ and claimed or suggested that I was some how blackmailing himтАж.really?!?! He is a problem, I donтАЩt care on whose damn side he is. He needs either to get over himself and not expected people to just fawn over him. I am quick to give people the benefit of the doubt, but I have also learned to recognize that when people strike out like that it is because they feel cornered.
I was not cornering himтАжbut the fact he perceived it that way and attacked me in responseтАжin the way he didтАж.a couple of things come to mindтАж.1) he was cornered because he did not want to answer the question and IтАЩd note, the answer he gave was a non-answer relative to my point/question of him; and 2) he was not cornered but is a narcissist that lacks self awareness.
I also found it troubling that his reply suggested he had been stalking my comments. That just plain gave me the creeps because he only ever replied to one or two of my comments. And Nass did the same routine. Interestingly, she went and testified, like me, regarding COVID legislation (which Ivam grateful for) тАжbut unlike me, she did not point to the elephant in the room! That is the globalist in our state who is building a biopharmaceutical corridor with the likes of Gates. Still left wondering why she refuses to name names of those doing the dirty deeds in her backyard. Guess it is easier to stay above the fray and have notoriety than have skin in the game at a local level.
Maybe that is not fair and some will perceive my comment as unkind or ungrateful. I am left wondering though why one would not name names when so much is at stake?
I notice how it is ok to name certain names тАж.Gate, Schwaub, Soros, etc. but the reality is there are plenty doing their bidding or working the agenda under radar in our neighborhoods, cities, statesтАж.we need to start naming names and exposing the game at that level or the resistance goes no where. The big names at the top have protection and they know it. It is the proxies working the plan that once called forward to account that will have to chooseтАж.loyalty to the agenda and the fin/tech elite bosses with a price to be paid or perhaps rethinking their actions because their friends and neighbors now know they are a wolf in sheepтАЩs clothing. Such are the predatory philanthropists.
Laura, I tried to respond to your comment the other day but Substack ate it and it was too long to retype, so here is the gist.
I don't know what happened in Robert's threads. If you were consistently nuanced, benevolent, respectful, not accusatory, not trying to grill him like he is a potential criminal or twist his arm, and he snapped at you out of the blue, then he is responsible for his lack of constraint, and I am sorry you found yourself on the receiving end of an internet conversation gone south. Since I don't know how the thread went, I cant say that I side with you or with Robert, I presume you were both sincere and it was of those things on the internet that spin out of proportion.
I can tell you that on my end, I usually ignore such things and forget about it immediately. One particular smart person blocked me based on that person's internal dynamic, after being rude to me on my own page, and I happily forgot about that person's existence, and I don't even have hard feelings. I truly don't care. Mind you, I also don't feel any urge to go around and criticize because honestly, the world is full of people acting on bad habits so who cares.
As far as Meryl, I love her. She is a human being of great courage and integrity, and I stand by her. She has done more for the world than many, and deserves a ton of gratitude and admiration.
Again, the devil is in the detail (and I don't know the detail) but every human being, including you, Meryl, Robert, Ginger, Peter, and everyone else, is entitled to selecting the areas of work on which we focus based on internal preference alone. That's a sacred part of life. And time is limited, so we all spend it where we want to spend it. So suspecting people based on the fact that they are not a clone of you (abstract you), your preferences and priorities, is a certain recipe for never leaving the state of feeling tragically underappreciated, and that's a miserable state.
My own philosophy is that if I feel like something needs to be done and no one's doing it, well, maybe then I should do it. It takes as much time to do that than to complain about others not doing it. And then I can feel at peace and bring my work to the world and seek dialogue from a place of love, confidence, and peace. But in any case, Meryl is one stunning human being with a great heart, and i don't want to see her name in the light of suspicion, she doesn't deserve it.
There are sacred things in life, goodness and courage are one of those, and I find it far more useful to support the people who do good work even if I don't agree with them on 100% of things (this is my general philosophy that works for me, you obviously are not me and you do what you like to do, etc.)
And also, I personally don't get mad at people if I have a theory that to me feels very important, and they don't pay attention, or disagree, etc It is possible to care passionately about something and not get mad at other for not caring about it! Perhaps it is one of the things we all need to learn at one point in life... it certainly was a useful discovery in my own life when I figured that out.
Perhaps I was influenced by the old art critic joke. As an artist, it reflects how I feel about life in general. :)
And truly, if Robert answered to only two of your comments and you are complaining, I don't think he answered to more than one comment by me (maybe two :), so.... you can imagine what it is like to get hundreds of comments, one cannot physically respond to every comment and stay sane and actually also do other things, like live in the physical world. People who have the time to be super active in comments either sit on their computer all day and work comments in cold blood as a marketing tool (I've worked in marketing and I know industry standards, that is the cynical reality:), or have a team of people working for them behind the scenes. There is no other way. No normal person has the time to hover every comment. Doesn't happen. Comments are meant to be a community of many people!!
Like, for example, this one took me probably an hour because I had to think it though. How many hours are there in a day? See?
Was I rude to him? NO, I asked a naive question about the mrna. I was truly unaware of all that's going on behind the scenes, and I trusted him. I asked in good faith. He called me a troll. I was like, Oh. My. God. He treats you nice tessa lena because you have influence. I am a nobody.
You are entitled to ask questionsтАж.always.
Only those who think they are above reproach or better than others resort to the tactics you describe and I experienced.
It is not ok. And only leads to more questions not the supposed unity that they keep insisting is essential.
I called Meryl out on her need to claim that she broke some fact or story before Karen Kingston. In my view, it was more about Meryl insisting that Karen Kingston was trying to step some standing it accolade that belonged to her. I basically said isnтАЩt what matters is the truth was now out there and questioned the need for some to be constantly jockeying for being the тАЬheroesтАЭ or latest set of тАЬexpertsтАЭ even as they bemoan the splintering of the MFM. She called me a fragger and was not nice about it.
She insisted it did matter who broke the news first. Really? Why? Sorry, but over time I have begun to see some have egos as big as Fauci and I personally have no desire to be beholden to them than I want to be beholden to Fauci.
As for bowing down and being so grateful and gracious about all they are doing for us. What? Seriously, I just canтАЩt even get on board at this point with that kind of hero worshipтАж.many in the MFM participated in this predatory system for yearsтАж.I stood up before they did.
So NO they do not get some loyalty for being on a national or global stage asserting themselves, especially when I have been in the trenches fighting with all I have for the little guy and then get called a fragger because I donтАЩt think the resistance should be about getting тАЬcredit.тАЭ
At this point, I have come to see the substack community as a silo into itself where the needle isnтАЩt being moved with regard to where it will make a differenceтАж.in the trenches.
As to TessтАЩ pointтАж.I am doing day in and day out what I feel needs to be done. And I will not apologize for noting that some in the MFM refuse (to use their platform) to get their hands dirty in a way in the trenches that might ultimately make a difference. The globalists are busy controlling my state and it sure feels like some refuse to actually name names. Why?
For what itтАЩs worthтАжI went to the public hearing in my state and named namesтАж.but I guess I can do that because IтАЩm not part of the industry or peer group we are supposedly fighting.
My bad. Just a fragger I guess.
Everybody may have the right to ask questions but everybody also has the responsibility to first and foremost, curb their own ego and not allow one's own self-righteousness (something that I am sure we all have to some degree) to get ahead of us, I remember that article by Meryl. She was 100% spot on in it. And she was also fair. On a side note, I am personally not subscribed to the genre of "calling out," by which I mean I don't engage in endless purity test back and forth threads, and I consider them extremely unhelpful. So My take on this is in principle different from yours. Cancel culture and its tool of "calling people out" is the last thing we need if we want to defeat Klaus Schwab, in my opinion.
Interesting put-down, fragging. I read an article on fragging in the Vietnam war. Soldiers would frag their superior officers. Colin Powell called it "attacks on authority." If there's anything authoritarians hate, it's attacks on their authority. Nass took your disagreement as a murderous attack. She needs to get over herself.
And I did not deserve to be called a fragger.
well no! of course not. it says everything about her and nothing about you.
Laura - He did that to me, too. I was shocked and dismayed at first. Then it gradually dawned on me that that's what liars and abusers do to deflect. I know from experience. Then I started checking out what other people, like you, have been saying.
the sacrifice of the innocent doesn't apply to malone. he is not innocent.