Germ or Terrain? Which Side Are You On? Tell Me Traitor, Etc.

Do purity tests help the people in need of help? No

Painting by Vasya Lozhkin

A lot of people are struggling with their health and needing help. In order to solve problems effectively, it is helpful to have an open mind. For instance, I’ve been looking into fungal and parasitic infections wreaking havoc in the West. It’s a serious problem, and yet the pride of many professional doctors often closes their minds to the possibility that fancy biomarkers and metabolic disorders—that they’d paid so much money to understand and be able to talk about—may often be a result of very trivial and unglamorous fungi or parasites. Yes, in combination with toxins, EMFs, vaccines, emotional stress, etc., but carried out by fungi and parasites none the less.

The purpose of this story is to showcase the unhelpfulness of the dueling match between the sincere people whose focus in “theory of disease” is germs—and the sincere people whose focus is terrain.

We are complex, composite beings! We contain a gazillion living beings on the inside who form a very unique and complex mosaic—in the physical realm and in the spiritual realm—and we interact with a gazillion of living beings who come from the outside! And of course, we, human beings, exist both in the physical realm (and the spiritual realm. When we talk about the things that we can see, we call it “the physical realm.” When we talk about the things that we usually can’t see in the same way we see the physical things but we can none the less “feel,” we call it “spiritual realm.”

When it comes to solving problems, dueling matches are unhelpful because the dogmatic versions of both views make the perception of reality poorer and limit the options for solutions. However, in practical terms, when we need to solve a problem, our solutions are most effective when we look into all aspects of the problem and address as many aspects of it as we can!

A metaphor: street robbery

Here is a metaphor, a thinking exercise.

Let’s say, a certain Mr. John Doe got mugged in the street. Why did he get mugged in the street? Is is because the bandit who mugged him is a horrible, violent man? Or is it because Mr. Doe lacked the skills to defend himself? Is it because the mugger had a big gun or because the victim had none?

A chain of events leading to “disease”

Let us do another thinking exercise, using the poor Mr. John Doe once again.

• Let us say, Mr. Doe experience a traumatic event. (Getting mugged isn’t fun).

• Let us say, before he got mugged, he’d lived in a state of perpetual emotional stress, and was subjected to perpetual out-of-control environmental toxicity, EMFs, etc.

• Let us say, he also got all his childhood vaccines, their cumulative effect on his health unknown.

• Let us say, the “background” toxicity—physical and emotional—weakened his immune response, the traumatic event of being mugged shocked him even further—and so when he encountered bandit microbes (forget the virus-no-virus thing, let’s make them intercellular parasites), he couldn’t quite defend himself right away.

• The microbial bandits started taking over cells, destroying them, stealing, breeding and feasting like the classic occupying thieves. When the cells of John Doe’s body wanted food, they had no good food because the parasites had eaten the good food—and so John’s own cells were left with toxic scraps, at best. Furthermore, the bandits infiltrated (literally) some of the immune cells, and the infiltrated immune cells started helping the bandits proliferate as opposed to fighting for John Doe. (For example, toxo knows how infect and hijack immune cells, including macrophages.)

• The microbial bandits also started to mess with various functions like chemical signaling, enzyme and hormone production etc., thus creating a variety of “symptoms” and "biomarkers” that can be registered by “tests.”

• Let us say, John Doe’s body feels attacked and mounts a strong response. To defend itself, it deposits large amounts of fibrin or similar “reparative” protein in one or several places. This could result in “blood clots” in case of infected endothelial cells, organ “fibrosis,” “amyloid plaques” in the brain, etc.
  
  (In one study¹, sadistic researchers wanted to see what would happen if toxo-infected mice were unable to form blood clots. So they infected mice with toxo, prevented formation of blood clots—without treating the mice for toxo—and the mice died quickly. The researchers concluded that fibrin in the blood (blood clotting) was a mechanism of defense that their bodies tried to mount against the parasite. The mechanism proposed in that particular paper has to do with IFN‐γ², a type of cytokine that is responsible for “activation of macrophages to increase phagocytosis, tumoricidal properties, and intracellular killing of pathogens”³ and that is also often responsible for the “cytokine storm.” ⁴

  

  (SOURCE)
  
  Other studies observed a similar protective effect of fibrin against other pathogens. For example:

  

  (SOURCE)
  
  Makes me wonder. If we focus on toxo alone, every third or second person in the world carries toxo. Toxo can sit in ambush for a very long time, then try to strike if the immunity drops. And so, in how many people, blood clotting is a response to toxo? (Perhaps, exacerbated very badly by God-awful injectable products?) And how many of them are then given blood thinners without any antiparasitic herbs? To my inner five-year-old who, just like me in my current form, is not giving any medical advice but simply sharing philosophical thoughts, it is blatantly obvious that if a suffering person is to be helped in earnest, anti-bandit measures should be used in balance with the measures to manage the damages to the “terrain”!!

• Back to Mr. Doe. When the “biomarkers” appear (fibrin deposits, inflammation, abnormal metabolism, etc.) the doctors get activated, observe morphological or metabolic changes, slap a “syndrome” on top of the “biomarkers,” and give John ten thousand pills to take—to undo the things that the body is doing in order to defend itself against the microbial hooligan.

• We are here now. John is on ten thousand pills, feeling not so great—and has no idea about the microbial bandit that is driving the “biomarkers” in the first place.

Conclusion

So, what caused John’s disease? The traumatic event? The prolonged emotional stress? The EMFs? Poisoned water and air? Heavy metals in his childhood vaccines? The microbial bandits? Blood clots? Inflammation? Which one is it?

Here is how I think about it.

John is a whole human being! His internal state is a factor to his health. His environment is a factor to his health. The microbes—good and bad, the ones who live on the inside and the ones he cones in contact in the outside world—are a factor, too!

Can we please dedicate our loving energy to the angles and points of view that appeal to us individually, help each other with our discoveries—and get off each other’s throats?

Mutually enriching experience is much more helpful than arguing about who is “correcter.” Jeez.

---

A note to readers: If you are in the position to do so, I very much encourage you to become a paid subscriber or donate. I love you in any case, but it helps A LOT, and I am in a dire need to get more donations and paid subscribers while keeping my posts free. Thank you from my heart for your support!

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2193855/

2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154595/#:~:text=Overview,an%20array%20of%20immune%20responses.

3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/interferon-gamma#:~:text=A%20primary%20role%20for%20IFN,reactive%20oxygen%20and%20nitrogen%20intermediates.

4. https://gamifant.com/ifny-in-primary.php