6 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I have a friend who will be fired here in California because her company won't accept her reasonable accommodation based upon susceptibility to anaphylaxis. Company won't accept her doctor's letter because it can't demonstrate causation. Simply put, to keep her job she will have to get the shot to prove causation. Even then if she goes into shock, probably couldn't get compensated because the anaphylactic shock would be incidental It's so fucked up here. If you're going to San Francisco, be sure to wear some needles in your hair.

Expand full comment

Oh dear - I follow attorney Robert Barnes, and he basically says go with religious exemption rather than medical, ESP in a crazy state like Cali, because it's nearly impossible to prove medical reasons. Also, "religious" does NOT mean you have to have a pastor/rabbi/priest/imam certify it - it can be a " church" of one, your own beliefs. That said, he's representing lots of mandate clients, as are many other prominent lawyers (thank God).

Expand full comment

I wonder if you took a d-dimer test before the shot and another one shotly after getting injected if that would be enough. I suspect no.

Expand full comment

What is a d-dimer test?

Expand full comment

It detects blood clots. If you showed there was no clotting before the injection that would be good enough proof for me. I suspect CICP is corrupt so it wouldn't matter

Expand full comment

Thanks. I know that San Francisco doesn't care about tests or true immunity acquired by those who had Covid.

Expand full comment