Concepts unfold according to their meaning.
Definitions matter.
I and others believe it's important to sort this out and to understand: logic is the sword. It cuts through to the truth of concepts and how they relate. Through making distinctions we're then free to see intuitively what's happening.
I and others believe it's important to sort this out and to understand: logic is the sword. It cuts through to the truth of concepts and how they relate. Through making distinctions we're then free to see intuitively what's happening.
Desmet maneuvers so that he can both say "manipulation happened" and also "there was no manipulation." But his theory is clearly "no manipulation." This is why he introduces the Sierpinski triangle in chapter 8: notice what the function of this figure is. This isn't "interpretation." This is simply what's presented.
I don't think that it is so clear. But again, we can disagree (and I appreciate the way we can debate honestly) but this subthread is about letting go of our preset ideas and praying for the truth to prevail whatever it is!!
Concepts unfold according to their meaning.
Definitions matter.
I and others believe it's important to sort this out and to understand: logic is the sword. It cuts through to the truth of concepts and how they relate. Through making distinctions we're then free to see intuitively what's happening.
Desmet maneuvers so that he can both say "manipulation happened" and also "there was no manipulation." But his theory is clearly "no manipulation." This is why he introduces the Sierpinski triangle in chapter 8: notice what the function of this figure is. This isn't "interpretation." This is simply what's presented.
I don't think that it is so clear. But again, we can disagree (and I appreciate the way we can debate honestly) but this subthread is about letting go of our preset ideas and praying for the truth to prevail whatever it is!!