FWIW, in the field of science, a growing number of cosmologists are getting red-pilled, thanks to data coming back from the James Webb Space Telescope.
Observations go completely against the Big Bang narrative that has been built up over the past 60 years.
"With measurement errors negated, what remains is the real and exciting possibility we have misunderstood the universe," said Adam Riess (lead researcher and Nobel prize winner).
I’m seeing more of these stories every week from JWST. It won’t be long before we experience the next scientific revolution. Einstein’s ideas (the math for the Big Bang) will be superseded. Einsteinwaswrong.com
Earth is flat and covered by a firmament 72-76 miles above us at its highest point. Forget about ludicrous telescope stories and try looking at the stars through a Nikon P900 or P1000. They are perfect lights not solid objects. Nikon stopped production of the latter camera when everyone sussed what the stars are and how close they are. The sun and moon are only a few thousand miles away too.
I read and was fascinated by 180˚ - and still learned a lot from this interview. It's rare, I think, to find someone with such a large capacity to absorb ideas who can also distill and share them with discernment. Thank you Tessa for offering this unique perspective!
I got as far as the mention of the fellow who saw something in the Soviet Union and claimed it was a "concentration camp" didn't have much time for the conversation after that.
An excellent book that, despite its size, is easy to read and exceedingly well-referenced.
I believe that Feargus is currently working on a book on spirituality and referencing the Cathars and The Gnostic scriptures in particular.
Their view is that the God of this world is not a benevolent loving God but the opposite. A theme expanded upon by Howdie Mickoskie in his book "Exit The Cave"
Thank you for making the interview available-Feargus is a good and honourable man.
Here's two quotes about possession and other "supernatural" phenomena...
Keep in mind that there's also UFO phenomena that mimics religious experiences.
"I believe humanity's foray into fiction began with the breakdown of the bicameral mind, and the insertion of meaningless symbols in between the subject and the seer. In short, back when people used pictographic alphabets, we were limited to discussing things we could actually see in the real world. The invention of phonemic alphabets like this one, which are comprised not of representative pictures but of meaningless letters, provides the opportunity to invent an endless stream of non-sense, the greatest of these being spelled with just a single capital letter."
"Daimonic Reality by Patrick Harpur examines UFOs and a wide variety of “paranormal” phenomena from a rather unique angle. Although Harpur never fully defines the daimonic—“the daimonic that can be defined is not the true daimonic,” as Lao-Tse would say—it seems to exist both inside us and outside us. Like the Greek daemon and unlike the Christian demon, it takes both good/healing and bad/terrifying forms, depending on our commitment to rationalistic ego states.
In a sense, the daimonic is like the collective unconscious of Carl Jung, inside us as a part of our total self that the ego wishes to deny, outside us in all the other humans who ever existed and in the dreams, myths, and arts of all the world. But Harpur follows Irish poet (and Golden Dawn alumnus) W. B. Yeats as often as he follows Jung, and traces some of his ideas back to Giordano Bruno and the alchemical/hermetic mystics of the Renaissance. The daimonic is just a bit more personalized and individualized than Jung’s species unconscious.
Harpur’s major thesis is that unless we recognize the daimonic (make friends with it, Jung would say) it takes increasingly malignant and terrifying forms. For instance, the Greys of UFO abduction lore, he says, are deliberately mirroring our ego-centered and “scientistic” age—showing no emotions of the humans they experiment upon, just as the ideal science student feels no emotion and has no concern with the emotions of the animal being tortured in his laboratory."
Despite dealing with many subjects common to conspiracy theories, this book does not quite fit into that category. We are the conspirators, so to speak. We have repressed the most creative part of ourselves and now it is escaping in terrifying forms."
I love that you mentioned so many of my favorite books, cesars messiah and political ponerology and jerry marzinsky work too! fun conversation, bless you both.
I really liked what Feargus had to say - I think he is spot on with respect to the way he discusses how to converse with others, and I can (need to) learn lessons from him.
That said I worry about some of the spiritual figures and works he appears to revere. In particular Edgar Cayce, who founded a cult known as the A.R.E (association of research and enlightenment), and Rudolf Steiner who founded an offshoot of Theosophy (think it was called Anthroposophy).
Why is this an issue? Because these figures / cults are Luciferian - as is the whole concept of enlightenment. I'm pretty sure that these cults are close to the core of the evil we face and tools of the powers that shouldn't be.
Mathew Crawford (Rounding the Earth substack) grew up as a member of the ARE and has a lot to say about it - none of it good. For example see https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-inspiration-of-kay-griggs-corruption quote "There is a debate about the veracity of Kay's words, but I believe her. In particular, her description of a military intelligence mafia that operates in Virginia Beach and uses rape as a tool for trauma-based mind control fits with what went on in the cult that I grew up in (Association for Research and Enlightenment, or A.R.E.)."
Rudolf Steiner was a disciple of Blavatsky (openly Luciferian - see "The Secret Doctrine") and ran the German "division" of Theosophy before splitting and founding his own cult with very similar beliefs - just a different leader. It is worth noting that almost every founding member of the Nazi party was a Theosophist. Also worth noting that Rasputin's closest colleague/lieutenant, successor and posthumous son-in-law was a theosophist as well. And of course Ghandi whose "revolution" may not have been quite what it seemed - as the Theosophy organization (which had close ties to freemasonry, and Aleister Crowley Golden Dawn, OTO, A.A. etc.) is often theorized to be a British intelligence operation. Oh - and of course Theosophy too has its own rich pedophile tradition e.g. Olcott. Amongst other things, Steiner founded schools (there are many in existence today). He deliberately misled parents about the spiritual values he was teaching their children (see https://www.quackometer.net/blog/2012/11/steiner-schools-and-risk-factors-for-child-abuse.html - quote "Rudolf Steiner made it explicit about how his teachers should mislead parents and authorities about the goals of their teaching because “if that connection were made official, people would break the Waldorf School’s neck”", and https://sites.google.com/site/waldorfwatch/he-went-to-waldorf). Googling around this subject leads to lots of disturbing stuff.
And obviously a lot of the spirituality elements of Feargus' conversation (reincarnation, spiritual advisers) are Theosophical beliefs.
And never forget the deep involvement of Theosophy in the establishment of the United Nations and the globalist movement.
A.A. is an magic/satanic/occult society founded by Crowley.
Alcoholics Anonymous is indeed free of relationship with theosophy as far as I am aware.
Yes - reincarnation is a belief which features in many belief systems. However Feargus mentioned several other theosophical beliefs as well as reincarnation and also alluded to two spiritual thinkers from that school who are deeply suspect as o have pointed out. So it is not merely that he talked about reincarnation - it is that he appears to adhere to a set of beliefs that - at a minimum. - overlap heavily with a deeply suspect occult group
I cannot speak for Feargus, I can speak for myself. I found the most pristine godly purity and the most coherence in the beliefs of many indigenous people. What has been done with it afterwards really depends, different people did different things. For example, Jung, from what I understand, kinda "founded a system" by taking some of the indigenous beliefs, putting his own, simplified spin on them as well as his name, and became famous for it. Did it help somebody? Perhaps, who am to judge. But as understanding travels through the funnels of branding, it usually loses some. Reincarnation is a belief that people held for many thousands of years, personally I believe that is is part of our life. Institutional people did a lot of damage, creating fear around what is supposed is to be all love, slandering the so called "pagans" for their own purposes of power and control. So it's all very twisted, really, our history...
I understand what you are saying here. And I'm not claiming to know much of anything for certain myself.
However
(a) I do know that there is at considerable evidence that Cayce and Steiner did a lot of bad things. Therefore - while that does not in and of itself - invalidate other things they may have believed - I do think it makes them very dubious sources of inspiration - in fact I would go further and suggest that one ought to entirely ignore them (which - for clarity - is not the same as saying that everything they taught or claimed is wrong, but IS saying that nothing they taught should be trusted).
(b) There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that
(i) occult groups (theosophy and ARE amongst them) are at the heart of the problems we face today.
(ii) occult belief systems (although perhaps not every individual component of those belief systems) when taken as a whole seem to lead to evil.
Personally, I am not attracted to theosophy, for different reasons that you described although of course people with not-so-good intentions tend to practice to dark side of any belief they find useful to them. In practice, it probably depends on the practitioner. I know people who are into Steiner who are lovely. Then there are others who are predatory. it also depends on the level of practicing this belief, I think. When I was a teen, I was into eastern philosophy and bonded with some ladies from a local theosophical society. I was interested in philosophy, as a teen I observed and thought that the ladies would likely benefit more from addressing their lives than from abstracting their minds into the clouds, but I think they didn't know how to address their lives, so they chose to take their minds of the pain of their lives and into getting together and talking about lofty subjects and feeling enlightened. I don't think they were trying to do anything evil :) At the same time, people who have not-so-good intentions would use anything that would help them control people, and every ism has been used for that purpose, alas.
I think you are spot on here. Occult societies work by recruiting many people and telling them what they want to hear in order to recruit them. Those people nearly always believe they are getting into something good. A handful know exactly what they are getting into and they are not good.
Many of the well intentioned people remain good even while they are members - I do agree with that. And many members never get all that involved.
However occult societies all work by having secrets (that's why they are called occult or secret societies - it's not that the society itself is a secret, it's that it keeps secrets) and the secrets are revealed one at a time as the member advances up the society's ranks (some societies have a more formal ranking system than others). And each secret revealed by the master(s) turns some value previously held by the ascending member on its head.
The societies carefully judge which members they wish to reveal secrets to, and members are not aware that they may have failed some test - they are always told they passed, but if they failed then they will simply never be told some of the secrets. So in this way the societies select the most corrupt or corruptible members and then corrupt them.
And they deceive their members as well as outsiders as to their true intentions. And thus even good people can work with the group towards an apparently noble goal, ignorant of the true, entirely different and ignoble goal toward which they are actually working.
So I would suggest that even though some members may be well-intentioned people (which might be slightly different from good), the societies themselves and their beliefe systems are not good. Jesus said that "a good tree does not bear bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit". And these societies consistently produce rotten fruit.
And irrespective of the intentions and degree of goodness of some members - I think one must be altogether more suspicious of the leaders of such groups - and even more so when they are on the record admitting to intentionally deceiving parents about what they are teaching their children as Steiner is.
FWIW I believe these groups have always controlled society by controlling knowledge and belief systems - and they treat the whole of society as just the outermost level of the group. So for example we are told that climate change is a thing - that allows them to direct us to behave in a way and work towards a purpose which we (well not us - but many people) believe is good and noble when in fact the true purpose of all these labors is to enrich the handful of "controllers". As one ascends through the levels one might be told that climate change is a lie - but it is still a noble lie - we have to do all these things to perhaps to prevent the collapse of the financial system for example. And as each lie is revealed you eventually, if you make it all the way, are told that the goal is pure power. And that any and all means are justified in attaining it.
I read a number of books about Cayce. He was extremely devoted to the Bible. As an adult he was used by Hollywood types (a set of brothers in particular) to enrich them, to his detriment. Oil wells and the like.He was used by a number of greedy people and it’s entirely possible that the current ARE is composed of such greedy types which dont
reflect his morals. He didn’t do “bad things “ although he was entrapped and falsely accused of such by the F$B$I and temporarily jailed in Detroit. He died basically of overwork trying to help others(e.g. mothers of missing WWII GIs. )
there's a certain spiritual purity in being able to question long-held beliefs and even completely revamp them
I think Covid showed us that a large portion of the population is tethered to the material world, unable to dig deeper if it threatens that superficial existence!
Thank You, Tessa, for again exploring past the edges of the Overton window, where mysteries of life can be engaged or stuffed-back-into-the-trunk for a while, as one may choose.
Really engaging, fascinating discussion, Tessa. Per usual.
Fascinating interview, thank you.
FWIW, in the field of science, a growing number of cosmologists are getting red-pilled, thanks to data coming back from the James Webb Space Telescope.
Observations go completely against the Big Bang narrative that has been built up over the past 60 years.
For example:
https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-hubble-tension-universe-expansion-study
"With measurement errors negated, what remains is the real and exciting possibility we have misunderstood the universe," said Adam Riess (lead researcher and Nobel prize winner).
I’m seeing more of these stories every week from JWST. It won’t be long before we experience the next scientific revolution. Einstein’s ideas (the math for the Big Bang) will be superseded. Einsteinwaswrong.com
Earth is flat and covered by a firmament 72-76 miles above us at its highest point. Forget about ludicrous telescope stories and try looking at the stars through a Nikon P900 or P1000. They are perfect lights not solid objects. Nikon stopped production of the latter camera when everyone sussed what the stars are and how close they are. The sun and moon are only a few thousand miles away too.
So let us be unconquerable
https://markbisone.substack.com/p/being-unconquerable
I read and was fascinated by 180˚ - and still learned a lot from this interview. It's rare, I think, to find someone with such a large capacity to absorb ideas who can also distill and share them with discernment. Thank you Tessa for offering this unique perspective!
I got as far as the mention of the fellow who saw something in the Soviet Union and claimed it was a "concentration camp" didn't have much time for the conversation after that.
An excellent book that, despite its size, is easy to read and exceedingly well-referenced.
I believe that Feargus is currently working on a book on spirituality and referencing the Cathars and The Gnostic scriptures in particular.
Their view is that the God of this world is not a benevolent loving God but the opposite. A theme expanded upon by Howdie Mickoskie in his book "Exit The Cave"
Thank you for making the interview available-Feargus is a good and honourable man.
Here's two quotes about possession and other "supernatural" phenomena...
Keep in mind that there's also UFO phenomena that mimics religious experiences.
"I believe humanity's foray into fiction began with the breakdown of the bicameral mind, and the insertion of meaningless symbols in between the subject and the seer. In short, back when people used pictographic alphabets, we were limited to discussing things we could actually see in the real world. The invention of phonemic alphabets like this one, which are comprised not of representative pictures but of meaningless letters, provides the opportunity to invent an endless stream of non-sense, the greatest of these being spelled with just a single capital letter."
Alphabet vs the goddess lecture by Leonard Shlain
https://robc137.substack.com/p/alphabet-vs-the-goddess
https://library.lol/main/F0FFF93E5BDCCCD182B46BCC074E05BB
"Daimonic Reality by Patrick Harpur examines UFOs and a wide variety of “paranormal” phenomena from a rather unique angle. Although Harpur never fully defines the daimonic—“the daimonic that can be defined is not the true daimonic,” as Lao-Tse would say—it seems to exist both inside us and outside us. Like the Greek daemon and unlike the Christian demon, it takes both good/healing and bad/terrifying forms, depending on our commitment to rationalistic ego states.
In a sense, the daimonic is like the collective unconscious of Carl Jung, inside us as a part of our total self that the ego wishes to deny, outside us in all the other humans who ever existed and in the dreams, myths, and arts of all the world. But Harpur follows Irish poet (and Golden Dawn alumnus) W. B. Yeats as often as he follows Jung, and traces some of his ideas back to Giordano Bruno and the alchemical/hermetic mystics of the Renaissance. The daimonic is just a bit more personalized and individualized than Jung’s species unconscious.
Harpur’s major thesis is that unless we recognize the daimonic (make friends with it, Jung would say) it takes increasingly malignant and terrifying forms. For instance, the Greys of UFO abduction lore, he says, are deliberately mirroring our ego-centered and “scientistic” age—showing no emotions of the humans they experiment upon, just as the ideal science student feels no emotion and has no concern with the emotions of the animal being tortured in his laboratory."
Despite dealing with many subjects common to conspiracy theories, this book does not quite fit into that category. We are the conspirators, so to speak. We have repressed the most creative part of ourselves and now it is escaping in terrifying forms."
I love that you mentioned so many of my favorite books, cesars messiah and political ponerology and jerry marzinsky work too! fun conversation, bless you both.
Thank you, ArtemisForestFairy! It really was a fascinating conversation!!
I really liked what Feargus had to say - I think he is spot on with respect to the way he discusses how to converse with others, and I can (need to) learn lessons from him.
That said I worry about some of the spiritual figures and works he appears to revere. In particular Edgar Cayce, who founded a cult known as the A.R.E (association of research and enlightenment), and Rudolf Steiner who founded an offshoot of Theosophy (think it was called Anthroposophy).
Why is this an issue? Because these figures / cults are Luciferian - as is the whole concept of enlightenment. I'm pretty sure that these cults are close to the core of the evil we face and tools of the powers that shouldn't be.
Mathew Crawford (Rounding the Earth substack) grew up as a member of the ARE and has a lot to say about it - none of it good. For example see https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-inspiration-of-kay-griggs-corruption quote "There is a debate about the veracity of Kay's words, but I believe her. In particular, her description of a military intelligence mafia that operates in Virginia Beach and uses rape as a tool for trauma-based mind control fits with what went on in the cult that I grew up in (Association for Research and Enlightenment, or A.R.E.)."
It has ties to military intelligence and there are many accounts of massive and ongoing psychological abuse including child rape etc. which continues to this day. e.g. See https://lawandcrime.com/ross-investigates/the-problem-was-much-bigger-than-we-initially-expected-virginia-summer-camp-faces-new-sexual-abuse-and-cover-up-allegations/
Rudolf Steiner was a disciple of Blavatsky (openly Luciferian - see "The Secret Doctrine") and ran the German "division" of Theosophy before splitting and founding his own cult with very similar beliefs - just a different leader. It is worth noting that almost every founding member of the Nazi party was a Theosophist. Also worth noting that Rasputin's closest colleague/lieutenant, successor and posthumous son-in-law was a theosophist as well. And of course Ghandi whose "revolution" may not have been quite what it seemed - as the Theosophy organization (which had close ties to freemasonry, and Aleister Crowley Golden Dawn, OTO, A.A. etc.) is often theorized to be a British intelligence operation. Oh - and of course Theosophy too has its own rich pedophile tradition e.g. Olcott. Amongst other things, Steiner founded schools (there are many in existence today). He deliberately misled parents about the spiritual values he was teaching their children (see https://www.quackometer.net/blog/2012/11/steiner-schools-and-risk-factors-for-child-abuse.html - quote "Rudolf Steiner made it explicit about how his teachers should mislead parents and authorities about the goals of their teaching because “if that connection were made official, people would break the Waldorf School’s neck”", and https://sites.google.com/site/waldorfwatch/he-went-to-waldorf). Googling around this subject leads to lots of disturbing stuff.
And obviously a lot of the spirituality elements of Feargus' conversation (reincarnation, spiritual advisers) are Theosophical beliefs.
And never forget the deep involvement of Theosophy in the establishment of the United Nations and the globalist movement.
This is all puzzling and concerning to me.
The belief in reincarnation dates back to the Vedas and is found in many spiritual beliefs, not just Theosophy.
Are you referring to Alcoholics Anonymous? If so, that organisation, to the best of my knowledge, had and does not have any connection with Theosophy.
A.A. is an magic/satanic/occult society founded by Crowley.
Alcoholics Anonymous is indeed free of relationship with theosophy as far as I am aware.
Yes - reincarnation is a belief which features in many belief systems. However Feargus mentioned several other theosophical beliefs as well as reincarnation and also alluded to two spiritual thinkers from that school who are deeply suspect as o have pointed out. So it is not merely that he talked about reincarnation - it is that he appears to adhere to a set of beliefs that - at a minimum. - overlap heavily with a deeply suspect occult group
my apologies was unaware of another A.A.To my knowledge, the other AA is a very fine morality based organisation !
I cannot speak for Feargus, I can speak for myself. I found the most pristine godly purity and the most coherence in the beliefs of many indigenous people. What has been done with it afterwards really depends, different people did different things. For example, Jung, from what I understand, kinda "founded a system" by taking some of the indigenous beliefs, putting his own, simplified spin on them as well as his name, and became famous for it. Did it help somebody? Perhaps, who am to judge. But as understanding travels through the funnels of branding, it usually loses some. Reincarnation is a belief that people held for many thousands of years, personally I believe that is is part of our life. Institutional people did a lot of damage, creating fear around what is supposed is to be all love, slandering the so called "pagans" for their own purposes of power and control. So it's all very twisted, really, our history...
I understand what you are saying here. And I'm not claiming to know much of anything for certain myself.
However
(a) I do know that there is at considerable evidence that Cayce and Steiner did a lot of bad things. Therefore - while that does not in and of itself - invalidate other things they may have believed - I do think it makes them very dubious sources of inspiration - in fact I would go further and suggest that one ought to entirely ignore them (which - for clarity - is not the same as saying that everything they taught or claimed is wrong, but IS saying that nothing they taught should be trusted).
(b) There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that
(i) occult groups (theosophy and ARE amongst them) are at the heart of the problems we face today.
(ii) occult belief systems (although perhaps not every individual component of those belief systems) when taken as a whole seem to lead to evil.
Personally, I am not attracted to theosophy, for different reasons that you described although of course people with not-so-good intentions tend to practice to dark side of any belief they find useful to them. In practice, it probably depends on the practitioner. I know people who are into Steiner who are lovely. Then there are others who are predatory. it also depends on the level of practicing this belief, I think. When I was a teen, I was into eastern philosophy and bonded with some ladies from a local theosophical society. I was interested in philosophy, as a teen I observed and thought that the ladies would likely benefit more from addressing their lives than from abstracting their minds into the clouds, but I think they didn't know how to address their lives, so they chose to take their minds of the pain of their lives and into getting together and talking about lofty subjects and feeling enlightened. I don't think they were trying to do anything evil :) At the same time, people who have not-so-good intentions would use anything that would help them control people, and every ism has been used for that purpose, alas.
I think you are spot on here. Occult societies work by recruiting many people and telling them what they want to hear in order to recruit them. Those people nearly always believe they are getting into something good. A handful know exactly what they are getting into and they are not good.
Many of the well intentioned people remain good even while they are members - I do agree with that. And many members never get all that involved.
However occult societies all work by having secrets (that's why they are called occult or secret societies - it's not that the society itself is a secret, it's that it keeps secrets) and the secrets are revealed one at a time as the member advances up the society's ranks (some societies have a more formal ranking system than others). And each secret revealed by the master(s) turns some value previously held by the ascending member on its head.
The societies carefully judge which members they wish to reveal secrets to, and members are not aware that they may have failed some test - they are always told they passed, but if they failed then they will simply never be told some of the secrets. So in this way the societies select the most corrupt or corruptible members and then corrupt them.
And they deceive their members as well as outsiders as to their true intentions. And thus even good people can work with the group towards an apparently noble goal, ignorant of the true, entirely different and ignoble goal toward which they are actually working.
So I would suggest that even though some members may be well-intentioned people (which might be slightly different from good), the societies themselves and their beliefe systems are not good. Jesus said that "a good tree does not bear bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit". And these societies consistently produce rotten fruit.
And irrespective of the intentions and degree of goodness of some members - I think one must be altogether more suspicious of the leaders of such groups - and even more so when they are on the record admitting to intentionally deceiving parents about what they are teaching their children as Steiner is.
FWIW I believe these groups have always controlled society by controlling knowledge and belief systems - and they treat the whole of society as just the outermost level of the group. So for example we are told that climate change is a thing - that allows them to direct us to behave in a way and work towards a purpose which we (well not us - but many people) believe is good and noble when in fact the true purpose of all these labors is to enrich the handful of "controllers". As one ascends through the levels one might be told that climate change is a lie - but it is still a noble lie - we have to do all these things to perhaps to prevent the collapse of the financial system for example. And as each lie is revealed you eventually, if you make it all the way, are told that the goal is pure power. And that any and all means are justified in attaining it.
I read a number of books about Cayce. He was extremely devoted to the Bible. As an adult he was used by Hollywood types (a set of brothers in particular) to enrich them, to his detriment. Oil wells and the like.He was used by a number of greedy people and it’s entirely possible that the current ARE is composed of such greedy types which dont
reflect his morals. He didn’t do “bad things “ although he was entrapped and falsely accused of such by the F$B$I and temporarily jailed in Detroit. He died basically of overwork trying to help others(e.g. mothers of missing WWII GIs. )
Clever evil people cloak themselves in the trappings of good. Wolves wearing sheeps' clothing.
Therefore these facts do not prove that Cayce was good, rather merely that he wished to appear so.
A good tree does not bear bad fruit, nor a bad tree good fruit.
Cayce bore rotten fruit.
He founded a society which is, and always has been,
(a) deeply interwtined with military intelligence
(b) abusive of its members up to and including pedophilia.
(c) esoteric in nature in direct contradiction of Jesus' teachings
there's a certain spiritual purity in being able to question long-held beliefs and even completely revamp them
I think Covid showed us that a large portion of the population is tethered to the material world, unable to dig deeper if it threatens that superficial existence!
Brilliant book.
The scope is impressive, it covers so many areas!
Thank You, Tessa, for again exploring past the edges of the Overton window, where mysteries of life can be engaged or stuffed-back-into-the-trunk for a while, as one may choose.
;-(
(do peek at my email, please)
Thank you, Brother John!! Will look now!!
Tessa Lena, I bought this book a few weeks ago, and I purchased one for my friend!
I’m REALLY enjoying this book! Don’t let the size of the book “intimidate” you. It’s a page turner in my humble opinion!
I highly recommend! Wake up to Truth! ✝️🕊️
Thank you Feargus for the handbook and companion to Truth!
Very true, thick books should not intimidate us! :)
Thank you, Robin!