According to The Science, Humans May Be Fueling Global Warming by Breathing
All eyes on the emissions-breathing little guy!
Look, before any COVID, I developed a theory that the new commercial frontier was air. I just had a feeling that clean breathable air was on its way of becoming new bottled water. Why did I have that feeling? Mostly, it was just my nose (or gut, whatever you call it). But also, based on logic, if the people upstairs think that everything is theirs—which they do—it sure is an incredible waste of potential profits to allow the peasants to breathe for free!
By the way, I still believe that the strangely aggressive push for masks had a lot to do with “facey training,” i.e. conditioning people to wear odd stuff on their faces at all times—first, cloth masks, but I think that cloth masks are destined to transform into smartmasks that include a very convenient personal air filter and a supercool interface to read the brain.
After all, the aspiring masters are currently in the data collection phase to build their perfect AI, they want to collect as much biological data as they can. They are looking at that extremely attractive computer-brain interface, and say, yum!
Here is what I wrote in April 2021 about smartmasks.
Here is what I wrote in 2022 for Dr. Mercola about selling “air.”
And here’s something from last year about smart cattleware.
Fast-forward to a few months ago, and we have this, courtesy of the New York Post (the time is December 2023):
Humans may be fueling global warming by breathing, a new study suggests.
“Exhaled human breath can contain small, elevated concentrations of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), both of which contribute to global warming,” according to research released last week in the UK journal PLOS.
The methane and nitrous oxide exhaled by humans make up about 0.1 of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions, the writeup said.
The gases are in addition to the carbon dioxide that humans exhale.
The study, led by Dr. Nicholas Cowan from the UK Center for Ecology and Hydrology, involved 104 adult volunteers and found that nitrous oxide was breathed out by every one of them, while 31 percent exhaled methane.
Those who did not exhale methane in their breath still probably released the gas “ion flatus,” the study said, referring to burping and flatulence.
The study itself is actually pretty silly, it reminds me of how they wrote dissertations and books on “scientific communism” in the USSR, i.e. they would just put together words that carried no detectable meaning but strongly conveyed the air of loyalty to the official ideology of the state.
Same with this “study.” The people in charge, who fund and commission such things, can then use this “science” to justify the boot in the form of, say, mandatory smartmasks, or a mandatory GM diet for peasants, or whatever else they come up with on a given day. The “scientists,” on the other hand, are more like children with counting sticks who count what they are told to count in order to gain access to the big global warming candy jar. I almost feel bad for them.
Here is what the very useful study says. (By the way, next, I would like to see a study on the emissions from the military and from all the private jets.)
Exhaled human breath can contain small, elevated concentrations of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), both of which contribute to global warming. These emissions from humans are not well understood and are rarely quantified in global greenhouse gas inventories. This study investigated emissions of CH4 and N2O in human breath from 104 volunteers in the UK population, to better understand what drives these emissions and to quantify national-scale estimates. A total of 328 breath samples were collected, and age, sex, dietary preference, and smoking habits were recorded for every participant. The percentage of methane producers (MPs) identified in this study was 31%. The percentage of MPs was higher in older age groups with 25% of people under the age of 30 classified as MPs compared to 40% in the 30+ age group. Females (38%) were more likely to be MPs than males (25%), though overall concentrations emitted from both MP groups were similar. All participants were found to emit N2O in breath, though none of the factors investigated explained the differences in emissions. Dietary preference was not found to affect CH4 or N2O emissions from breath in this study. We estimate a total emission of 1.04 (0.86–1.40) Gg of CH4 and 0.069 (0.066–0.072) Gg of N2O in human breath annually in the UK, the equivalent of 53.9 (47.8–60.0) Gg of CO2. In terms of magnitude, these values are approximately 0.05% and 0.1% of the total emissions of CH4 and N2O reported in the UK national greenhouse gas inventories.
What do you, emissions breather, think?
A note to readers: If you are in the position to do so, I very much encourage you to become a paid subscriber or donate. I love you in any case, but it helps A LOT, and I am in a dire need to get more donations and paid subscribers while keeping my posts free. Thank you from my heart for your support!
Carbon Credits. These are already traded as commodities between large corporations and manufacturers. If you have the money you can exceed your allocation by buying up the unused CC's of others. Or risk paying massive fines, operations being shut down.
Take this down to the individual. Which is the ultimate goal. Each person allotted Carbon Credits. To exceed one's allotment they will need to have money to buy the unused CC's of others. Or risk paying massive fines, their life's "operations" being shut down.
But these are not cruel rules of tyrants. No, they are busy developing an alternative means of existence for those who don't have the money to pay their 'fair share' for the carbon they're responsible for adding to the climate. Our kind, benevolent rulers intend to provide us with options:
1) Pay for Carbon Credits to live comfortably, travel, eat well, exercise, socialize at will.
2) Live meagerly within limited means, 15-minute cities, rolling blackouts, insect diets, isolation.
3) Live comfortably, travel, eat well, exercise, socialize at will - in a Virtual Reality world. Voluntarily give up your carbon-producing physical body and have your consciousness uploaded to a VR Avatar or become transhuman. A world where you can 'live' the life of your dreams! Abundance, want for nothing, never age if you don't want to, be perfectly safe - as long as you no longer produce carbon.
That will be the world. IF we allow it. That's where this "science" of carbon emissions is leading to. Unless and until it is rejected en masse.
We know that there are many poor, broken, lonely and misguided souls who actually would prefer Option #3 to Option #2 if Option #1 is out of reach. Some among us are already so broken they'd prefer it even if they had the money to live in Option #1. Hopeless souls who would help create such a world, and even enforce it on others against their will.
There is no climate crisis. There's a crisis of the human soul. Vilifying Carbon is vilifying life itself. Life deemed "useless" by an evil parasitic class of broken souls who worship money, power and status and have forsaken God and God's greatest creation, believing themselves to be gods. Just. Say. No. And find comfort, joy and peace in God's Amazing Grace. He is a loving God. There for all who seek him. Even the wicked who repent and seek to know him, who will stand humbly before him. This is the only true path to our salvation, and to save the world.
hey guys i have a great idea. a smart diaper! it measures the amount of methane you, um, emit, and then charges against your carbon score. it's reversible - you can wear it on your face every time you burp. and you'll be burping a lot because you'll be hungry!