18 Comments

We found a lot of the same information to share, Sister Tessa. ;-}

​Many of us can see that we are being treated to false emergency narratives to make us comply with the established power order, and give up our rights, as established by existing laws. It is hard to see why, to see the real emergency, perhaps the real emergency is being hidden more effectively than the artificial emergencies are being promulgated. Not a bad bet, and we might even be complicit in obscuring the real emergency, ourselves.​

​ I propose that the real emergency is that global growth economy has already ended, and those who are aware of that are making feverish preparations for the day that the world realizes it, and the distribution systems based upon growth-economy become perplexed and dysfunctional.

Expect the mandates of command-economy.​ How will this play out?

https://www.johndayblog.com/2021/07/it-already-happened.html

Expand full comment
Jul 20, 2021Liked by Tessa Lena

That "slight of hand" is part of the Orwellian plot to commandeer language in a way that grants agencies, NGO ( as if there are NGO's that aren't captured in the U.S) - and government - total power over area BREATH OF YOUR LIFE. That slight of hand and finessing of verbiage allowed the W.H.O to gain control over 198 countries during this "pandemic" - and the 2008 near-demic.

Reiner Fuelmich took a deposition from a world-reknowned WHO scientist where she described how that process went down over the last several years - led by the psychopathic manipulations of Bill Gates

Expand full comment
Jul 20, 2021Liked by Tessa Lena

the cloak and halo

Expand full comment
Nov 19, 2022Liked by Tessa Lena

great article. I have a suggestion for us like-minded writers. It seems like we are operating in an echo chamber. Perhaps we need to get the word out via books, creative fiction, teen novels, etc., that help elicit independent thinking. After all, our market is those people who do not actively engage in finding the truth. Wish you all luck

Expand full comment
Jul 20, 2021Liked by Tessa Lena

Thank you for your work!

Expand full comment
Jul 20, 2021Liked by Tessa Lena

Over fifty years ago I lived in London for a year and often heard the Brits complain about how Americans mangled English. What you reveal is that the language will now be trotted out on a turkey shoot for the gentry to suit any political convenience. Manglish, here we come. I find this another superb and thought provoking essay.

Expand full comment
Jul 20, 2021Liked by Tessa Lena

Peter McCullough noted that he had verified the numbers three different ways and come to the conclusion that VAERS is underestimating by around a factor of ten, in this specific case. The people pushing all these ludicrous ideas about biotech would be comical if their delusions weren't creating a catastrophe.

Expand full comment

This is a fascinating article, although I would say that the evidence of word-hijacking is already available to us in the 2019 definition: "a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease".

However, in this case, the hijacking had occurred with the word "disease" - which is still defined in the Merriam Webster dictionary this way (though I'm betting change may well be on its way):

" disease noun

dis·​ease | \ di-ˈzēz

\

Definition of disease

1 : a condition of the living animal or plant body or of one of its parts that impairs normal functioning and is typically manifested by distinguishing signs and symptoms : sickness, malady"

Notice: disease is a condition in the living animal or plant body and NOT a micro-organism.

Clinical disease, as experienced by the living organism, is in fact what people need and want treatments for. The development of vaccines was ALREADY a bait and switch - producing a product that addressed the presence of micro-organisms AS A PROXY for a product that treated a disease. (see 2019 "simple" definition of "vaccine").

In this way, just for example, the eradication of a specific virus - the one that got itself labelled as THE "poliovirus" - can be lauded as a PR victory for vaccines, even though the clinical disease that formerly carried the name "poliomylitis" is still with us - albeit under many different names. Just for a short list of them off the top of my head - non polio acute flaccid paralysis, acute flaccid paralysis, Guillane-Barre syndrome, acute flaccid myelitis, and etc. If you study these you will see that people still suffer from a disease totally indistinguishable from "poliomyelitis", although the huge "iron lungs" that haunted people's imaginations have evolved a bit.

At the point of creating the polio vaccine, which also took place in the context of huge publicity and theatre, this bait and switch happened, and the idea of treating clinical disease was pushed forever into the background in favour of waging war against micro-organisms.

Expand full comment

Superb! Thank you!

Expand full comment

Thought re vax: Hannah Arendt says propaganda is for organization, not persuasion. Seems like something similar might be said about the vax.

Expand full comment