The WHO and a Quick Collection of News
Plus, pets.
A quick share. Three things.
One, Dr. Mercola published my article about the four ways in which the WHO is trying to establish a regime of eternal global money laundering for the wealthiest people on the planet—at our great expense—under the guise of “public health.”
The article was written with a lot of gratitude to Dr. Meryl Nass and James Roguski who are doing a phenomenal job educating the public about the WHO—and actively pushing back.
(PDF)
In May 2022, the World Health Organization adopted Amendments to International Health Regulations, time for individual countries to turn around and reject them is running out
A whole new set of potentially dangerous Amendments is in the works, the latest draft is not available to the public, the available drafts are nefarious
On September 20, 2023, the UN plans to adopt a “Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response” promoting the need to spend an additional 30 billion every year on “global health emergency preparedness”
In May 2024, the 300+ new amendments and the WHO CA+ Framework Convention (formerly known as “Pandemic Treaty”) are scheduled to be adopted
Time to let our opinions heard and say no to neofeudalism is now
Two, I highly recommend this analysis posted by the Health Freedom Defense Fund (founded by Leslie Manookian who is one of the bravest people I know) on the oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Health Freedom Defense Fund et al. v. Alberto Carvalho.
Oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Health Freedom Defense Fund et al. v. Alberto Carvalho yesterday was nothing short of jaw-dropping.
The plaintiffs, Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), California Educators for Medical Freedom (CAEMF), and several individuals, are appealing the district court’s dismissal of their lawsuit against the Los Angeles Unified School District’s (LAUSD) Covid-19 vaccine mandate.
One of the three judges admitted he was “shocked” and “floored” by LAUSD’s ongoing Covid-19 vaccine mandate for its employees as well as by LAUSD’s “irrational” justification for the policy.
Another judge expressed his concern over the breadth of the district court’s decision and declared that the district court’s rationale was clearly wrong.
And three, if you are following the electoral developments, tomorrow (September 17), Stand for Health Freedom, an organization co-founded by the long-standing hero of the health freedom movement Sayer Ji, whose work I have been admiring for a long time, will host a virtual town hall with RFK Jr., for whom I also have tremendous respect (and no, I don’t have to agree with him or anyone on every single point to respect his long-standing health freedom stance and the fact that the man is risking his life to run; agreements and disagreements are a part of human life, I’ve accepted it a long time ago). You can find more information about the townhall here.
Stand for Health Freedom invited all the presidential candidates to participate in a live digital town hall. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was the first to respond. We’re excited to speak with him on Sunday, September 17 at 2 pm PT.
A bonus item from the Guardian (New Normal, hi):
Question: Would you give up your pet if you were told to do so?
If you are in the position to do so, I encourage you to become a paid subscriber or donate. I love you in any case, but it helps A LOT, and I am currently in a dire need to get more donations and paid subscribers while keeping my posts free. Thank you from my heart for your support!
Oh, by the way, I do think that keeping animals in a city apartment is utterly unnatural. Keeping people in city apartments is not particularly natural, either, but at least people can leave the apartment. "Pets" in the modern sense is a very new concept, it has existed for barely a century. Prior to that, in villages, "house" cats were free roaming, and dogs were somewhat free roaming. Also fed very minimally but free roaming. What I find abusive is depriving the "house" animals of their sexuality. Like, what fun is it to live one's life as a castrated living being? Not much fun, and "security" is not worthy compensation. And I do think that they is done to animals is eventually done to people (see, The Chip). Anyway, just thought I would add that!
I have a dog sleeping on a couch next to my bed right now. We live in a suburban home with a fenced backyard, so he is free to go outside in the fenced area. They are not human, so questions of freedom and agency should not be considered from a human centric viewpoint. A pretty good life overall. My dog even has a Twitter account @TotallyCanc3l3d , which he used to post vaccine-related materials when I was suspended ;-)