spoiler alert: this is the uber-creepy coda to that 2015 paper. you want slippery slope?
"I have argued that we need a war on aging. If indeed the greatest threats we face are biological in the form of disease and aging, perhaps we should embrace much higher risk research than we do now. It would no longer be the role of the soldier to non-consensually participate in such high-risk research into common human diseases and aging. But we could pay people, and pay them a lot (See footnote 7) to perform this invaluable role. Perhaps it is time to change our civilian ethics, as well as our military ethics."
btw meryl nass is awesome. she has a 30+ year track record exposing the horrific effects of experimental vaxes on american troops. she has researched where few if any dared to go. she basically worked for free and was one of the very few doctors in new england prescribing hcq and ivm when they were needed. she's fought the corrupt maine bureaucrats trying to cancel her and done so with grace and even a sense of humor.
Have you noticed that the term “soldier” has been increasingly replaced by the term “warfighter” in publications such as those you cite? Weird. To be a fly on the wall in the room when that semantic plan was hatched!
After WWII a lot of newly minted shrinks went to work trying to make sense of the fact that on average only 1 in 20, um, regular soldiers would fire offensively in combat. Turns out that human beings really don’t like killing one another. And every, um, warfighter has a breaking point at which exposure to/ participation in interpersonal violence becomes intolerable. People cease to function. Buncha eggheads went to work and learned all sorts of ways to increase the kill rate, also how to fend off inevitable collapse. They determined that killing at a distance is way easier than doing it up close, also how to keep people functioning in combat via increased creature comforts and skype calls with loved ones and trips home and shit but still, everyone has a breaking point and a sure sign that it’s impending is an uptick in atrocities. Perversity is the “erotic form of hatred” and it is everywhere now.
These assholes have driven themselves mad. They are damned.
One of the painful wrinkles of this benighted moment is the contempt I find myself feeling toward them. I loathe them from their toenails to the tops of their pointy heads.
But I am determined not to be infected with the same sadistic bullshit that those of us who felt a duty to warn were/are subjected to. The contempt is justified, whatever that means, but I’m not into it.
When I’m very lucky I remember that this is the kind of challenge by which true release from suffering arises, when we renounce evil even as we leave its adherents to their fate we dwell amidst saints.
The key issue is that we don’t need any more science. All “science”.
Huge effort is made into mass producing university offspiring who have no clue about real life but hold multiple certificates and diplomas and pretend to know something. More effort is made into mass multiplying pseudo businesses who are completely useless eaters of taxpayers‘ money. These abound mostly in “smart“ and IT fields - which basically “process“ data or, in layman terms, do nothing but do a lot of it.
To justify the existence of these two, even more effort is made into circulating “knowledge“, or regurgitaging stuff that nobody really wants or needs, but that sounds sophisticated and progressive. Hundreds of “scientific“ journals and magazines print and reprint things 90% of which is fake, false, useless or outright dumb, according to Ioannidis.
Then, to justify the existence of all the previous parasites international conferences, symposias, presentations and awards are spread, following the rule “the more the better“ (a variation on the theme „repeat lies often and loud, and they will believe them in the end“). Clearly, a well-developed media networks are needed to indoctrinate everybody around about, say, how badly farmers in Tanzania need space travel to Mars and beyond.
Truth is dying out. 24/7, we build fake science (like that about dinosaurs which were pretty much non-existent before AD 2000 or space “inventions“ that produce unimaginable costs and destruction of the environment in return for literally nothing useful). Then we mass produce doctors, PhDs or plain experts in these absurds. Digital technologies help these things grow abundantly, just because in silico models may be eternal, while one single real-life experiment would destroy all this “science“ in five seconds flat.
Stop the science. All science. We don‘t need anything “new“. We only need to learn how to efficiently use the real knowledge of the world that we already have. Strangely enough, the world has survived without any science until about 1900. The story after this year is about killing, destroying and releasing toxins, NOTHING beneficial for the humanity. We do our best to damage the super-complex world of which we know next to nothing. And we are so successful at it.
We need a worldwide transformation. We need to assign small parcels of reclaimed land to all scientists and theory-lovers, managers, lawyers, arbitrators, stock exchange parasites, advisors, investors and all members of “governing“ bodies - ordering them to produce food for the rest of the world. No labs, no experiments, no chemicals, no space fakes, no media glitter, no letters around the name. Only real work, helping others and being actually useful for once. Who knows, maybe, just maybe these “scientists“ would finally feel in harmony with the existence. What if they discover a simple feeling of being happy and satisfied with real work with soil, nature, rain and sun?
Hugs to you too. I owe you comments. Trying to figure out what happens to the articles I bookmark! Any guidance appreciated! Writing on tiny keyboard without autocorrect so excuse any profanity. It is unintentional. 😊
How much risk? NONE. It's NOT THEIR JOB. Forcing it or even making it voluntary weakens our military. Military personnel need to be as healthy as possible. We should not subject them to any potential risks not related to their mission.
It's always possible to create not only a rational but a convincing case for any position. That's what all that double-talk about equivalent risk is all about.
I hadn't given this the time it deserved earlier, but have just now really really read it. Very close to home for me. It is an excellent piece of writing, and I so appreciate your voice. I come from a long line of warriors, soldiers who loved their country and fought for freedom and the human soul since the beginning.
Keep writing ...
In the meantime, my heart is broken again ... I love my country so much. It's very difficult to face these facts, but we must.
I was in the army (mandatory for males) for two and half years and I say this: Where logic and reasoning stops, army starts.
and about the established science of today this says it all:
Dr. John Ioannidis: “… science itself may have become a threat to overall population health……”
From Dr. John Ioannidis article in The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice:
“ … Now add the uncertain but plausible possibility that COVID-19 was itself the product of biomedical science, and an apparently outrageous consequence becomes inescapable: science itself may have become a threat to overall population health… [I]t is hardly irrational that an increasing proportion of the dissatisfied public is wondering whether truth and the path to a healthier world must lie somewhere else than within prestigious journals and celebrities at the science–policy–communication interface…. “
You might have to did through Sasha Latypovtova work and Kathleen from Balliwick but I'm pretty sure one of them mentions the specific contractual wording in the Pfizer/DoD agreements that state that the C19 shots informed consent, is under the militarized version of "uninformed informed consent". Essentially because the redacted ingredients sheets provided to Drs etc, meant that true informed consent could not be given. 😐😐🤨😑
That's how they got around the legalities of humanitarian laws.🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
great sleuthing Tessa!
spoiler alert: this is the uber-creepy coda to that 2015 paper. you want slippery slope?
"I have argued that we need a war on aging. If indeed the greatest threats we face are biological in the form of disease and aging, perhaps we should embrace much higher risk research than we do now. It would no longer be the role of the soldier to non-consensually participate in such high-risk research into common human diseases and aging. But we could pay people, and pay them a lot (See footnote 7) to perform this invaluable role. Perhaps it is time to change our civilian ethics, as well as our military ethics."
btw meryl nass is awesome. she has a 30+ year track record exposing the horrific effects of experimental vaxes on american troops. she has researched where few if any dared to go. she basically worked for free and was one of the very few doctors in new england prescribing hcq and ivm when they were needed. she's fought the corrupt maine bureaucrats trying to cancel her and done so with grace and even a sense of humor.
Thank you for highlighting this!!!! Yes, indeed!!!
And Meryl is just amazing. So kind!
Can We the People stand a chance to fight any of this?
Do not participate.
And this too might help:
https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/at-the-local-level-52d?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1287362&post_id=128379917&isFreemail=false&utm_medium=email
https://stopmandatoryvaccination.substack.com/p/enough-with-the-plandemic-sequels?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=941703&post_id=128136573&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
Absolutely. First though, we need to realize WHO we are, and the natural power(s) we possess. Jessie Herman does a great job here of explaining this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzb1ZBGidmc&t=2363s
Have you noticed that the term “soldier” has been increasingly replaced by the term “warfighter” in publications such as those you cite? Weird. To be a fly on the wall in the room when that semantic plan was hatched!
After WWII a lot of newly minted shrinks went to work trying to make sense of the fact that on average only 1 in 20, um, regular soldiers would fire offensively in combat. Turns out that human beings really don’t like killing one another. And every, um, warfighter has a breaking point at which exposure to/ participation in interpersonal violence becomes intolerable. People cease to function. Buncha eggheads went to work and learned all sorts of ways to increase the kill rate, also how to fend off inevitable collapse. They determined that killing at a distance is way easier than doing it up close, also how to keep people functioning in combat via increased creature comforts and skype calls with loved ones and trips home and shit but still, everyone has a breaking point and a sure sign that it’s impending is an uptick in atrocities. Perversity is the “erotic form of hatred” and it is everywhere now.
These assholes have driven themselves mad. They are damned.
One of the painful wrinkles of this benighted moment is the contempt I find myself feeling toward them. I loathe them from their toenails to the tops of their pointy heads.
But I am determined not to be infected with the same sadistic bullshit that those of us who felt a duty to warn were/are subjected to. The contempt is justified, whatever that means, but I’m not into it.
When I’m very lucky I remember that this is the kind of challenge by which true release from suffering arises, when we renounce evil even as we leave its adherents to their fate we dwell amidst saints.
The key issue is that we don’t need any more science. All “science”.
Huge effort is made into mass producing university offspiring who have no clue about real life but hold multiple certificates and diplomas and pretend to know something. More effort is made into mass multiplying pseudo businesses who are completely useless eaters of taxpayers‘ money. These abound mostly in “smart“ and IT fields - which basically “process“ data or, in layman terms, do nothing but do a lot of it.
To justify the existence of these two, even more effort is made into circulating “knowledge“, or regurgitaging stuff that nobody really wants or needs, but that sounds sophisticated and progressive. Hundreds of “scientific“ journals and magazines print and reprint things 90% of which is fake, false, useless or outright dumb, according to Ioannidis.
Then, to justify the existence of all the previous parasites international conferences, symposias, presentations and awards are spread, following the rule “the more the better“ (a variation on the theme „repeat lies often and loud, and they will believe them in the end“). Clearly, a well-developed media networks are needed to indoctrinate everybody around about, say, how badly farmers in Tanzania need space travel to Mars and beyond.
Truth is dying out. 24/7, we build fake science (like that about dinosaurs which were pretty much non-existent before AD 2000 or space “inventions“ that produce unimaginable costs and destruction of the environment in return for literally nothing useful). Then we mass produce doctors, PhDs or plain experts in these absurds. Digital technologies help these things grow abundantly, just because in silico models may be eternal, while one single real-life experiment would destroy all this “science“ in five seconds flat.
Stop the science. All science. We don‘t need anything “new“. We only need to learn how to efficiently use the real knowledge of the world that we already have. Strangely enough, the world has survived without any science until about 1900. The story after this year is about killing, destroying and releasing toxins, NOTHING beneficial for the humanity. We do our best to damage the super-complex world of which we know next to nothing. And we are so successful at it.
We need a worldwide transformation. We need to assign small parcels of reclaimed land to all scientists and theory-lovers, managers, lawyers, arbitrators, stock exchange parasites, advisors, investors and all members of “governing“ bodies - ordering them to produce food for the rest of the world. No labs, no experiments, no chemicals, no space fakes, no media glitter, no letters around the name. Only real work, helping others and being actually useful for once. Who knows, maybe, just maybe these “scientists“ would finally feel in harmony with the existence. What if they discover a simple feeling of being happy and satisfied with real work with soil, nature, rain and sun?
Great article again. I want to comment more, but my stupid Internet is stinky today. And I just loathe writing on a phone.
I, too, loathe writing on the phone!!! Big hugs to you!
Hugs to you too. I owe you comments. Trying to figure out what happens to the articles I bookmark! Any guidance appreciated! Writing on tiny keyboard without autocorrect so excuse any profanity. It is unintentional. 😊
It's shameful how the DOD treats the military.
I think this is tied in with the Covid19 stuff.
"“paganus” in Latin simply means a “rural dweller,” a hands-on demographic that always been a sore thumb in the eyes of tyrants"
I did not know that. Explains a LOT. Thank you :)
Did not know the etymology. Certainly well aware that tyrants don't like us country folk :P
How much risk? NONE. It's NOT THEIR JOB. Forcing it or even making it voluntary weakens our military. Military personnel need to be as healthy as possible. We should not subject them to any potential risks not related to their mission.
<3 <3
Thank you.
Thank you, 420MedicineMan!! xo
It's always possible to create not only a rational but a convincing case for any position. That's what all that double-talk about equivalent risk is all about.
I hadn't given this the time it deserved earlier, but have just now really really read it. Very close to home for me. It is an excellent piece of writing, and I so appreciate your voice. I come from a long line of warriors, soldiers who loved their country and fought for freedom and the human soul since the beginning.
Keep writing ...
In the meantime, my heart is broken again ... I love my country so much. It's very difficult to face these facts, but we must.
Thank you, God-Loving Woman! What you are saying is so true. Face the truth, we must. And love is here to heal us in truth, I think.
You can be sure of that.
Thank you Tessa
I was in the army (mandatory for males) for two and half years and I say this: Where logic and reasoning stops, army starts.
and about the established science of today this says it all:
Dr. John Ioannidis: “… science itself may have become a threat to overall population health……”
From Dr. John Ioannidis article in The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice:
“ … Now add the uncertain but plausible possibility that COVID-19 was itself the product of biomedical science, and an apparently outrageous consequence becomes inescapable: science itself may have become a threat to overall population health… [I]t is hardly irrational that an increasing proportion of the dissatisfied public is wondering whether truth and the path to a healthier world must lie somewhere else than within prestigious journals and celebrities at the science–policy–communication interface…. “
You might have to did through Sasha Latypovtova work and Kathleen from Balliwick but I'm pretty sure one of them mentions the specific contractual wording in the Pfizer/DoD agreements that state that the C19 shots informed consent, is under the militarized version of "uninformed informed consent". Essentially because the redacted ingredients sheets provided to Drs etc, meant that true informed consent could not be given. 😐😐🤨😑
That's how they got around the legalities of humanitarian laws.🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
thank you as always Tessa. I love what you write. x
Thank you, David!
Even journalists bully and badger people into getting vaccinated and don’t understand that isn’t consent.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-governments-war-on-vaccine-opponents-could-be-a-legal-own-goal/
Thank you, John, for the link to your article and letter and for your long-standing courage!