After very carefully constrained and time limited exposure to a well controlled amount of inhaled graphene in mice, the lung inflammation was "moderate" at 28 days, "but did not induce remodeling", which implies that it did not destroy structural components of the lungs that would need extensive repair.
Cellular elements could still be destroyed within this wording.
Additionally, work exposures in humans can be massive at once, or can go on for 28 years, not 28 days. The mouse model showed lung inflammation which was "moderate" in the estimate of researchers who are paid to find good news.
At the next step of telling the story, the researchers called these effects on the mice "mild", and by the time the article was sent out "Graphene dust not harmful" is the blanket statement.
Graphene has the potential to be much more harmful than asbestos, and in vastly smaller amounts, and not just by inhallation by miners and workers, but through skin, gut and potentially injection.
Graphene should clearly be treated at least as carefully as asbestos, but there's money to be made, and companies to be sold off before the medical complications get joined into class action suits.
Sounds like mesothelioma and asbestos - asbestos was pretty much OK if left in place, but when it was removed, it produced dust, which when inhaled, produced a kind of cancer called mesothelioma. So abraded graphene oxide - dust - might have the same effect, the danger would come when the parts containing the graphene oxide were exposed and produced dust which could be inhaled. Graphene itself is insoluble in water and is pretty inert, but it's a really good conductor of electricity, so it's not likely to be a problem, but when it's converted to the oxide - like in a battery fire or something - and there's dust - the dust is dangerous on its own, and is also water soluble, so it can get into the bloodstream and mess things up, same case for cytoplasm. As an adjuvant in vaccines, it's been in use for about 8 years - probably as the unoxidized graphene form - and is unlikely to be present in sufficient quantities to cause any harm. And any harms caused probably won't be to respiratory systems - unless the vaccine is given intranasally - and it's still in such small quantities as to not make a difference. If the adjuvant is graphene oxide, things might be different. Chronic vs acute exposure would probably make a difference as well. (PhD, physical/organic chemistry, 1987, UFlorida)
Dane Wigington has been saying this It’s in the jabs it’s what they spray on us 24/7 It’s everywhere and there’s no such thing as organic maybe a little bit better but there poisoning isn’t everyday
Great article! I am having severe EMF sensitivity and have been reading and reading about molecular communication on https://www.ieee.org/ you are not alone and your research is well-done. Thank you for writing about this. I'm also looking into eyewear glass, frames, contact lenses, and cataract overlays. I'm looking into clothing. Let's get you connected to Dr. Robert Young https://www.drrobertyoung.com/blog
Note that court cases glyphosate have only become successful after Germany's Bayer took over Monsanto in a acquisition deal that is now known as 'the worst takeover in history'
I won't be shedding any tears, both companies deserve what is coming to them right now.
And then there's the suspected nano sized Graphine Hydroxide purported to be in some, if not most of the vaxxes?? Mad scientists and totally insane funders
After very carefully constrained and time limited exposure to a well controlled amount of inhaled graphene in mice, the lung inflammation was "moderate" at 28 days, "but did not induce remodeling", which implies that it did not destroy structural components of the lungs that would need extensive repair.
Cellular elements could still be destroyed within this wording.
Additionally, work exposures in humans can be massive at once, or can go on for 28 years, not 28 days. The mouse model showed lung inflammation which was "moderate" in the estimate of researchers who are paid to find good news.
At the next step of telling the story, the researchers called these effects on the mice "mild", and by the time the article was sent out "Graphene dust not harmful" is the blanket statement.
Graphene has the potential to be much more harmful than asbestos, and in vastly smaller amounts, and not just by inhallation by miners and workers, but through skin, gut and potentially injection.
Graphene should clearly be treated at least as carefully as asbestos, but there's money to be made, and companies to be sold off before the medical complications get joined into class action suits.
"Business-cycle"
remember the kentile floors sign - you could see it from the smith/9th street station https://youtu.be/PsH5vzlFKNQ
By definition, how can anything "toxic" be harmless? Have they proven their claim?
Hydrogen peroxide a possible antidote: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263964802_Degradation_of_Graphene_by_Hydrogen_Peroxide
The mad cow zombies are upon us.
You have to remember the driving force was the fear factor plus social pressure and BANNING dissent.
Have you seen the movie, "Invasion of the body snatchers:?"
My Spidey sense and theory realist self is in, "HOLY SHIT!" mode.
Freedom community. I love that 🤩
All right, ok now. Two groups. Natural, usually free, or some labor involved,
and then big money, supposed to help. Only helps big money, but many buy into it.
This brings to mind a 2014 Cyanide & Happiness cartoon where it declares
“Five out of Six Doctors Agree that Russian Roulette is Completely Safe”
https://explosm.net/comics/kris-five
It’s my short hand argument for covax “safety”
does anyone know what is in the chem trails?
Sounds like mesothelioma and asbestos - asbestos was pretty much OK if left in place, but when it was removed, it produced dust, which when inhaled, produced a kind of cancer called mesothelioma. So abraded graphene oxide - dust - might have the same effect, the danger would come when the parts containing the graphene oxide were exposed and produced dust which could be inhaled. Graphene itself is insoluble in water and is pretty inert, but it's a really good conductor of electricity, so it's not likely to be a problem, but when it's converted to the oxide - like in a battery fire or something - and there's dust - the dust is dangerous on its own, and is also water soluble, so it can get into the bloodstream and mess things up, same case for cytoplasm. As an adjuvant in vaccines, it's been in use for about 8 years - probably as the unoxidized graphene form - and is unlikely to be present in sufficient quantities to cause any harm. And any harms caused probably won't be to respiratory systems - unless the vaccine is given intranasally - and it's still in such small quantities as to not make a difference. If the adjuvant is graphene oxide, things might be different. Chronic vs acute exposure would probably make a difference as well. (PhD, physical/organic chemistry, 1987, UFlorida)
Dane Wigington has been saying this It’s in the jabs it’s what they spray on us 24/7 It’s everywhere and there’s no such thing as organic maybe a little bit better but there poisoning isn’t everyday
Great article! I am having severe EMF sensitivity and have been reading and reading about molecular communication on https://www.ieee.org/ you are not alone and your research is well-done. Thank you for writing about this. I'm also looking into eyewear glass, frames, contact lenses, and cataract overlays. I'm looking into clothing. Let's get you connected to Dr. Robert Young https://www.drrobertyoung.com/blog
Note that court cases glyphosate have only become successful after Germany's Bayer took over Monsanto in a acquisition deal that is now known as 'the worst takeover in history'
I won't be shedding any tears, both companies deserve what is coming to them right now.
Hmm? Didn't see my comment. Where did you go, o comment?
Couldn't sign in on new chromebook. So, short version here.
Two groups, with maybe a bit in-between; natural, costs nothing, and
Money producing..destroys but maybe does it faster.
I'm with natural.
And then there's the suspected nano sized Graphine Hydroxide purported to be in some, if not most of the vaxxes?? Mad scientists and totally insane funders