Sorry Tessa, it's Mission Impossible because all Politicians have been Bought & Paid for, so that's where the story ends. I'm not 'defeatist, but a realist hoping that the Revolution might encourage a change of attitude, but, as the voting systems seem to be preprogramed to suit those with the purse strings that want the WEF to complete their total take-over of the planet. Sad, but that's where we are. Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed and still fighting!
Reason I mentioned this Ode article first published by Mercola is not that he published it first but that there's no author's name, I only looked at it because of the title...Suggest he includes author's name to stuff published by others.............*
Apparently, that 10 jabs for every EU resident. Take out 'abstainers; and kids and you can probably double that number. Nice for Ursula's Pension pot though?
Reintroduce LIABILITY (retrospectively) and it's 'bye bye' to Pfizer & other murdering Injection makers!
I think introducing liability would be very good. Do you have a strategy how to do it? I know that some of the brightest legal minds have been working on it, so far, nothing. Curious to hear your practical ideas!!
Indeed, when we don't know history, we are doomed to repeat it. (Quote: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.“ ~ George Santayana And its corollary: "Those who learned from the past are condemned to watch as others repeat it.")
Here's the thing. YouTube doesn't yet censor the following videos of the horrors committed by the fascist states of Europe in the 1930s & 1940s.
Monsters of that ilk are what we have at the helm nowadays. Isn't it? With their imposed iatrogenesis.
PS Indeed, all this sh*t goes back into the 18th-19th-20th centuries: Darwin, H.G. Wells, the Huxley bros, Caroll Quigley, Bertrand Russell, etc.; the Rockefeller family, and on and on, till today with the Gates foundation!
Encl.
Maybe it is time to look at what is about to happen to us in real time:
Beautiful piece. I keep thinking that most people keep hoping that the 'grachs will wake up--snap out of it. If only we paid more fealty to them? Then they would love us again? No, their's is a special kind of malevolence. Maybe it springs from resentment, for not being able to feel empathy? Maybe the only "joy" they feel comes though their peculiar kind of sadism, where the pain of others triggers a faint quasi-empathy. But unfortunately, that just makes them angrier, more resentful, more cruel. This is what I imagined when I hear Obama say: "We tortured some folks". Or the giddy quip from Hillary Clinton regarding Gaddafi gruesome death. It seems that other people's suffering is the only thing they feel. Maybe, in a sick way, this is how they connect?
"Mercola," while he was still "allowed" to run his own site, banned me forever for speaking my mind a a civilized fashion. These days, it's hard to believe that he still exists. I wanted to buy his archives with the comments (the comments were a lot more memorable than his articles, anyway), but was ignored. His original site kept publishing stuff 3-5 years later than what was available in my book from 2012 without ever mentioning my name. His site used to be good for discussion and there are a few articles he is publishing that are good, but only sporadically.
Ray,, I don't know what happened between you but I do know that I consider Dr. Mercola to be one of the most fierce warriors for freedom and natural health alive today. He is doing tremendously important work, and I am honored and that he publishes my stories, I like him!! He has helped many people, too!! And he has been through a lot with all the censorship and attacks on "alternative" medicine. Importantly, I am not really looking to get involved in yet another schism, it is already ridiculous what is happening!!
Nothing personal and it looks like he is just too big to be allowed to function independently. That was immediately clear after he introduced the 48-hour deadline on his articles.
He is still propagating "infectious" viruses, while there is literally no evidence of anything like that existing. He is using the paradigm (Germ Theory) and the terminology of the official narrative, which only reinforces the forces of Evil. I'm sure, he means well, but this is not the way to do it...
His site has always been selling enough stuff to make anyone bankrupt or even kill them, if they took all those goodies.
"His" articles (ghostwriters, of course) kept contradicting each other all the time...
At the moment, grains of truth are hidden in his recent work, but that's only traces and only scratching the surface, contributing to the gaslighting of his readers...
I think that while everyone can make up their mind about any "heated" issues. such as viruses or no viruses, or anything in-between, it is super unproductive to be creative divisions along these lines. I have said it before and I am happy to say it again because that is what I think. I have my own theory but I am not even going there this second because honestly, addressing the threat from the transhumanist regime is far more important right now that arguing about whose scientific vision is "correcter." I don't like it one bit when people point fingers at others who disagree with them and accuse them of God knows what. He is doing great work, that much I know.
I sounds like you feel unappreciated for not "winning" some kind of an argument that I really know nothing about. I could be right, I could be wrong, but I think it is an unproductive approach to point fingers and bicker at brave people doing tremendously important work. To the external eyes, it sounds like envy, even though I don't know if it is that or not. Maybe we can just focus on our own work and let others do it their way?
In many ways, Mercola is respectable and seems to be trying to save whatever can be saved. Still, I'm not even sure if he is still alive or it's all another deepfake.
Eventually, the little ones like us are still allowed to operate and we must definitely support each other (please, insert links to your articles in my comment sections, whenever applicable). Together we can reach a large-enough audience without attracting much attention.
It doesn't matter what I think. I simply pointed out facts and I don't have any emotional response to them. This is the way things work and only morons complain about it. :)
You and I do as much as we can, which might not amount to much in the end, but at least it's honorable.
I am pretty sure Dr. Mercola is still alive, luckily. :) I think it's best we stay within the realistic realm, or else it is very easy to go bonkers, and it's not a good thing!! And yes, doing our work in the best way we can and being respectful of other people work is honorable.
The question is, do you think that people will listen to you quicker if you talk a little louder? And even if voting is not really working and has not worked for a while (which I think is mostly correct), do you think that making people feel bad about themselves if they vote is a winning strategy? :) And are you positive that it never works even on the lowest level in 100% of cases? Actually, a bigger question, when you are sure of something (anything) that is not direct evidence of your senses, what makes you sure 100%? Something to ponder... epistemology is an important thing to ponder...
The trouble with voting is not that it doesn't work, but that it does work. Voting is a sincere, devotional act of power worship. Which "side" wins is never the point-- only that "we, the people" kneel, kiss the feet of ruling powers and continue to allow our minds, hearts and souls to rot ensnared within pitiful belief that power-seeking psychos can be made to behave as we desire.
Thank you Tessa. Good thought provoking and validating listening. Looking forward to upcoming interviews. 👍
Sorry Tessa, it's Mission Impossible because all Politicians have been Bought & Paid for, so that's where the story ends. I'm not 'defeatist, but a realist hoping that the Revolution might encourage a change of attitude, but, as the voting systems seem to be preprogramed to suit those with the purse strings that want the WEF to complete their total take-over of the planet. Sad, but that's where we are. Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed and still fighting!
Reason I mentioned this Ode article first published by Mercola is not that he published it first but that there's no author's name, I only looked at it because of the title...Suggest he includes author's name to stuff published by others.............*
Thank you Michael! I think the article had my name, just checked the Substack, it has "about"at the end. Good point though!!
I meant where the article is listed on Mercola's leading page along with other articles, I don't think I saw your name there. Anyway, Mercola...
You made me double-check, thank you! I am there, hooray :)
Apparently, that 10 jabs for every EU resident. Take out 'abstainers; and kids and you can probably double that number. Nice for Ursula's Pension pot though?
Reintroduce LIABILITY (retrospectively) and it's 'bye bye' to Pfizer & other murdering Injection makers!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer.
I think introducing liability would be very good. Do you have a strategy how to do it? I know that some of the brightest legal minds have been working on it, so far, nothing. Curious to hear your practical ideas!!
Dear Tessa Lena,
Indeed, when we don't know history, we are doomed to repeat it. (Quote: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.“ ~ George Santayana And its corollary: "Those who learned from the past are condemned to watch as others repeat it.")
Here's the thing. YouTube doesn't yet censor the following videos of the horrors committed by the fascist states of Europe in the 1930s & 1940s.
Monsters of that ilk are what we have at the helm nowadays. Isn't it? With their imposed iatrogenesis.
PS Indeed, all this sh*t goes back into the 18th-19th-20th centuries: Darwin, H.G. Wells, the Huxley bros, Caroll Quigley, Bertrand Russell, etc.; the Rockefeller family, and on and on, till today with the Gates foundation!
Encl.
Maybe it is time to look at what is about to happen to us in real time:
https://youtu.be/pt_y_moVqk8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdyWbHE-IS8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bxrds3unsFc&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcQ37Ycx9Bg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvDGukAAESY
https://youtu.be/kwlh3ta6gRA
https://youtu.be/tFGodTJH4ws
https://go2.propaganda-exposed.com/docuseries/episode-3/
https://brownstone.org/articles/we-can-and-will-survive/
Beautiful piece. I keep thinking that most people keep hoping that the 'grachs will wake up--snap out of it. If only we paid more fealty to them? Then they would love us again? No, their's is a special kind of malevolence. Maybe it springs from resentment, for not being able to feel empathy? Maybe the only "joy" they feel comes though their peculiar kind of sadism, where the pain of others triggers a faint quasi-empathy. But unfortunately, that just makes them angrier, more resentful, more cruel. This is what I imagined when I hear Obama say: "We tortured some folks". Or the giddy quip from Hillary Clinton regarding Gaddafi gruesome death. It seems that other people's suffering is the only thing they feel. Maybe, in a sick way, this is how they connect?
Thank you for the links. The Bobbie Anne Cox article is paywalled; other than a teaser opening. I just can’t afford to pay for all these Substacks.
"Mercola," while he was still "allowed" to run his own site, banned me forever for speaking my mind a a civilized fashion. These days, it's hard to believe that he still exists. I wanted to buy his archives with the comments (the comments were a lot more memorable than his articles, anyway), but was ignored. His original site kept publishing stuff 3-5 years later than what was available in my book from 2012 without ever mentioning my name. His site used to be good for discussion and there are a few articles he is publishing that are good, but only sporadically.
What is bravery, after all?
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/care-to-fight-against-slavery
Ray,, I don't know what happened between you but I do know that I consider Dr. Mercola to be one of the most fierce warriors for freedom and natural health alive today. He is doing tremendously important work, and I am honored and that he publishes my stories, I like him!! He has helped many people, too!! And he has been through a lot with all the censorship and attacks on "alternative" medicine. Importantly, I am not really looking to get involved in yet another schism, it is already ridiculous what is happening!!
Nothing personal and it looks like he is just too big to be allowed to function independently. That was immediately clear after he introduced the 48-hour deadline on his articles.
He is still propagating "infectious" viruses, while there is literally no evidence of anything like that existing. He is using the paradigm (Germ Theory) and the terminology of the official narrative, which only reinforces the forces of Evil. I'm sure, he means well, but this is not the way to do it...
His site has always been selling enough stuff to make anyone bankrupt or even kill them, if they took all those goodies.
"His" articles (ghostwriters, of course) kept contradicting each other all the time...
At the moment, grains of truth are hidden in his recent work, but that's only traces and only scratching the surface, contributing to the gaslighting of his readers...
I think that while everyone can make up their mind about any "heated" issues. such as viruses or no viruses, or anything in-between, it is super unproductive to be creative divisions along these lines. I have said it before and I am happy to say it again because that is what I think. I have my own theory but I am not even going there this second because honestly, addressing the threat from the transhumanist regime is far more important right now that arguing about whose scientific vision is "correcter." I don't like it one bit when people point fingers at others who disagree with them and accuse them of God knows what. He is doing great work, that much I know.
I sounds like you feel unappreciated for not "winning" some kind of an argument that I really know nothing about. I could be right, I could be wrong, but I think it is an unproductive approach to point fingers and bicker at brave people doing tremendously important work. To the external eyes, it sounds like envy, even though I don't know if it is that or not. Maybe we can just focus on our own work and let others do it their way?
In many ways, Mercola is respectable and seems to be trying to save whatever can be saved. Still, I'm not even sure if he is still alive or it's all another deepfake.
As for viruses or no viruses, it doesn't matter:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-is-right-and-who-is-wrong
Eventually, the little ones like us are still allowed to operate and we must definitely support each other (please, insert links to your articles in my comment sections, whenever applicable). Together we can reach a large-enough audience without attracting much attention.
It doesn't matter what I think. I simply pointed out facts and I don't have any emotional response to them. This is the way things work and only morons complain about it. :)
You and I do as much as we can, which might not amount to much in the end, but at least it's honorable.
I am pretty sure Dr. Mercola is still alive, luckily. :) I think it's best we stay within the realistic realm, or else it is very easy to go bonkers, and it's not a good thing!! And yes, doing our work in the best way we can and being respectful of other people work is honorable.
Tessa, always the voice of reason - and done with the utmost patience. So impressed.
Couldn't have said it better. :)
The question is, do you think that people will listen to you quicker if you talk a little louder? And even if voting is not really working and has not worked for a while (which I think is mostly correct), do you think that making people feel bad about themselves if they vote is a winning strategy? :) And are you positive that it never works even on the lowest level in 100% of cases? Actually, a bigger question, when you are sure of something (anything) that is not direct evidence of your senses, what makes you sure 100%? Something to ponder... epistemology is an important thing to ponder...
(hmmm....comment removed, T's reply reveals its' content nonetheless)
The trouble with voting is not that it doesn't work, but that it does work. Voting is a sincere, devotional act of power worship. Which "side" wins is never the point-- only that "we, the people" kneel, kiss the feet of ruling powers and continue to allow our minds, hearts and souls to rot ensnared within pitiful belief that power-seeking psychos can be made to behave as we desire.