I think the most fruitful course of action is to ask the Biden administration lawyers the following question:
“Would it be lawful for the Commander-in-Chief (C-i-C) to order the DMED database to be falsified?”
It may seem counterintuitive, but the C-i-C could claim that he had not other choice in a perilous time (Russia-Ukraine, China-Taiwan, etc.) but to order that the data be altered to avoid exposing a broadbased weakness in the US military. If vax injuries were disclosed, then US adversaries might be able to exploit that weakness.
This question needs to be asked by:
1. Attorneys for the Navy Seals, especially if their case goes to the Supreme Court. I would love to hear Clarence Thomas ask the question because it could NOT be ignored.
2. Congress. Rep. Massie or Sen. Johnson, Sen. Paul, etc.
It is a fair question, and I want to hear Administration lawyers answer it.
1. If they respond “yes, the C-i-C does have that broad authority, and such an order would be lawful,” then there is no reason to believe the data. And the implication is that the data was likely falsified.
2. If they respond, “No, such an order would not be lawful,” that would hang any hogh-ranking officer who issued such an order. I suspect that would bring out whistleblowers in force.
3. If they decline to answer or say “it depends…” then I think the popular sentiment would revert to “yes.” Meanwhile, whistleblowers on the fence might be encouraged to come forward.
So it would be a tricky question. Each answer provided a benefit. It is just of matter of asking…
"Bizarrely, the only bucket that does not show an increase is Bell’s Palsy, which contradicts the data from the rest of the world."
There are some other categories that show no increase. There are so many types of injury and illness and codes for them. There are literally codes as specific as skateboarding accidents. But it would take forever to examine every one of them.
The Bell's Palsy example was just interesting because we have certainly seen data suggesting 2021 should stand out as a year of elevated incidence. That it does not in the most recent DMED data is quite suspicious.
Just watched your interview. Matthew's suspicion of the server migration being used as a technique to 'wipe the fingerprints off of the fraud' is where I would bet my money.
I think he's probably right. My only quibble is that his faith in the absolute efficiency of the military (and not everyone, by far, who works in/on DMED is in uniform, anyway) is touching, but not always entirely correct.
May 24, 2022·edited May 24, 2022Liked by Tessa Lena
Fewer things more dangerous than a government that lies to its citizens. Who's surprised, at this point? Also, one thing we have learned with certainty is that no government or government official has the citizens's best interest at heart. Not a single one, globally.
There sure is a different set of rules for the State than there is for the rank and file citizenry. The State can cheat, steal, maim, kill, destroy evidence, etc. and then all they have to do is lie about it when they get caught. In many cases, the person or persons that bring the State's nefarious deeds to light, are then harmed by the State.
Thank You, Tessa and Mathew. This forensic analysis is very good for clarification, since the waters were muddied last summer to cover the perfidy, to create an alibi, if not examined more closely.
I think the overall context is that of a terminally corrupted imperial financial and military system.
Thank you for giving Mathew an opportunity to discuss this serious matter in more detail, Tessa. I am planning to recommend the Corona Investigative Committee interview Mathew when I get an opportunity to connect with Reiner. (You’re on my list of recommendations, too :-)
Tessa this is an EXCELLENT write up!
Two of my favorite humans!!
I think the most fruitful course of action is to ask the Biden administration lawyers the following question:
“Would it be lawful for the Commander-in-Chief (C-i-C) to order the DMED database to be falsified?”
It may seem counterintuitive, but the C-i-C could claim that he had not other choice in a perilous time (Russia-Ukraine, China-Taiwan, etc.) but to order that the data be altered to avoid exposing a broadbased weakness in the US military. If vax injuries were disclosed, then US adversaries might be able to exploit that weakness.
This question needs to be asked by:
1. Attorneys for the Navy Seals, especially if their case goes to the Supreme Court. I would love to hear Clarence Thomas ask the question because it could NOT be ignored.
2. Congress. Rep. Massie or Sen. Johnson, Sen. Paul, etc.
It is a fair question, and I want to hear Administration lawyers answer it.
1. If they respond “yes, the C-i-C does have that broad authority, and such an order would be lawful,” then there is no reason to believe the data. And the implication is that the data was likely falsified.
2. If they respond, “No, such an order would not be lawful,” that would hang any hogh-ranking officer who issued such an order. I suspect that would bring out whistleblowers in force.
3. If they decline to answer or say “it depends…” then I think the popular sentiment would revert to “yes.” Meanwhile, whistleblowers on the fence might be encouraged to come forward.
So it would be a tricky question. Each answer provided a benefit. It is just of matter of asking…
"Bizarrely, the only bucket that does not show an increase is Bell’s Palsy, which contradicts the data from the rest of the world."
There are some other categories that show no increase. There are so many types of injury and illness and codes for them. There are literally codes as specific as skateboarding accidents. But it would take forever to examine every one of them.
The Bell's Palsy example was just interesting because we have certainly seen data suggesting 2021 should stand out as a year of elevated incidence. That it does not in the most recent DMED data is quite suspicious.
Just watched your interview. Matthew's suspicion of the server migration being used as a technique to 'wipe the fingerprints off of the fraud' is where I would bet my money.
You don't have to be an attorney to make a FOIA request, you can send one on your own. They're pretty simple and there are templates available online.
I think he's probably right. My only quibble is that his faith in the absolute efficiency of the military (and not everyone, by far, who works in/on DMED is in uniform, anyway) is touching, but not always entirely correct.
Fewer things more dangerous than a government that lies to its citizens. Who's surprised, at this point? Also, one thing we have learned with certainty is that no government or government official has the citizens's best interest at heart. Not a single one, globally.
There sure is a different set of rules for the State than there is for the rank and file citizenry. The State can cheat, steal, maim, kill, destroy evidence, etc. and then all they have to do is lie about it when they get caught. In many cases, the person or persons that bring the State's nefarious deeds to light, are then harmed by the State.
Thank you for this! I read Mathew's article on it, I did not understand fully and I'm glad you had the conversation I would have liked to have had.
minor typo:
medical billion codes ->
medical billing codes
Please send this to Ed Dowd and Naomi Wolfe at once. As well as Senator Johnson, Senator Hawley, Matt Goetz, Ron Paul, Steve Bannon, Stew Peters
This all leads to one end point: the deliberate destruction of our military by a mandated "experimental "poison.
It's a massive murder attempt, from within.
Treason doesn't completely cover it, but it's a start.
Thank You, Tessa and Mathew. This forensic analysis is very good for clarification, since the waters were muddied last summer to cover the perfidy, to create an alibi, if not examined more closely.
I think the overall context is that of a terminally corrupted imperial financial and military system.
https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/context?s=w
"unknown whether the additional layer of corruption was added by accident, or whether it was added to create confusion. "
Added on purpose and the "accident" part is the same old "incompetence" excuse they wore out decades ago.
How come every single flippin' "accident" or "error" always points the same damn way?
Kinda like the bank, I never "get" extra money!
Thank you for giving Mathew an opportunity to discuss this serious matter in more detail, Tessa. I am planning to recommend the Corona Investigative Committee interview Mathew when I get an opportunity to connect with Reiner. (You’re on my list of recommendations, too :-)