Great conversation, all it of, thanks. Re the 'extermination' of the American Indians, I think we use that word, but for those Indians still alive and well, it doesn't fit and perpetuates the idea that we killed them off. I think they beg to differ, as much as their culture was deciimated it was not entirely elimated. This link begins to speak to some of the American Indians more recent progress and achievments http://worldwithoutgenocide.org/genocides-and-conflicts/american-indian. I am not sure they agree with our assessment that they were exterminated, I think its a perpetuation of the myth. We were ALMOST successful, partially successful, so not successful.
I so enjoyed listening to this conversation. Thanks to you both. I felt a true kinship present while listening while working in my kitchen.😉🤗 Thank you so much!
In 2020, I coined the phrase 'The New Absurd' and never engendered laughs in public spaces. Like CJ Hopkins (but with less satirical talent) I stopped being funny in that same year.
Great conversation... Glad you brought up Steven Newcomb... (who rustled through the dialogue for half an hour prior to your mention) Thanks to you, I've read his magnificent 'Pagans in the Promised Land' and seen the documentary it gave rise to, and the sources mentioned in it. And though I might not have conceived of it as an "earlier reset", even before Newcomb I've always known this famous American Liberty was one side of the coin at best (Newcomb mentions this too, he mentions Benjamin Franklin's secret thoughts/letters).
And what a joy to hear Dr. Emanual Garcia speak... someone in the resistence who knows his Catullus, wow! I thought it'd never happen (Catullus as a sublime poet & as a stand-in for pre-Christian culture
- with it's own shadows, as Emanuel rightly remarks). Again, thank you so much!
Here in lackey Canada, we are more than just hewers of wood, and drawers of water, with our role in NORAD we provide space for the nukes shot out of the sky. At least a person who lives New Zealand will not be vaporized. Make sure you have some Prussian Blue and Lugol's Iodine on hand. I have a feeling the homeland is going to bring it home. I am wondering if they are dumbing down the psychiatrists, are they doing the same to psychologist?
The medicalization of psychiatry is NOT 'off to the side'. Before 1920, psychoanalysts were ANALYZING the varieties of humans in the same way that entomologists analyze the varieties of mosquitoes. After 1920, psychiatry joined the "enlightenment" view that all humans are identical passive particles, who can be modified in any direction by externally applied forces like chemicals.
If psychoANALYSTS had continued the old way of ANALYZING, we'd have more official and scientific recognition of the character of psychopaths. When we refuse to recognize the innate types of humans, we are unable to keep the bad types out of power.
The current monstrosity has only a slight 'off to the side' connection with microscopic pathogens. The monstrosity is entirely caused by giant psychopathogens.
I am enjoying listening to this conversation (I am about half way through). I like your analogy about humanity being like an irresponsible teen age boy, beating his chest and saying "look at me i`m the best and i'm invincible" :) Thanks for sharing that one Tessa, it made me smile.
I like Dr. Emanuel Garcia as a person but I do not share his romanticized views of the "beautiful" ideals of 'democracy'.
In my opinion, Statism (what ever flavor it is , whether "democracy", "communism", "socialism", "fascism" or any other ism) is inherently immoral. I see all forms of involuntary governance (including 'democracy', not that we have ever had a real functioning democracy to begin with) as nothing more than glorified multi-generational crime cartels.
I do not accept violent coercion and involuntary governance as being a means to 'preserve freedom' or 'provide security' or any of the other propaganda lines we are fed, it is a means to enslave and a means for a small group of humans to feed on a larger group of humans, like parasites.
I agree with James Corbett when he said "No, I do not want better elections. I do not want to "clean up the system." I do not want to "get the money out of politics" and "make sure every vote is counted" and "drain the swamp" so we can "Make America [or any other geographical area] Great Again."
The state is not a benevolent force, despite what the most brainwashed of statists believe. It is not even a neutral tool that can be used for good or ill, as those who consider themselves pragmatists believe. It is violence. It is force. It is aggression. It is people believing that what is wrong for any individual to do is perfectly OK if an agent of the state does it.
If I steal, it is theft. If the state steals, it is taxation. If I kill, it is murder. If the state kills, it is warfare. If I force someone to work for me involuntarily, it is slavery. If the state does it, it is conscription. If I confine someone against their will, it is kidnapping. If the state does it, it is incarceration. Nothing has changed but the label.
What binds us to the state is the belief that there is a different morality for anything that has been sanctified through the political process. "Oh, 50%+1 of the population voted for forced vaccinations? Then I guess we have to comply." If you scoff at that sentence, how about if the vote were 100%-1? Would that change the morality of resistance? How about if forced vaccinations were mandated by the constitution? Then would you be compelled to submit?
Does the ballot box transform the unethical into the ethical? Of course not. But I'll tell you what it does do: It makes everyone who casts their ballot a part of the process that legitimizes the murder and violence committed by agents of the state.
No, I am not an efficiency manager for the state. I do not want to help it do its job of inflicting aggression and violence on peaceful people. I want the state to perish, not through violence or bloodshed, but by removing the mystical superstition from the minds of the general public that makes them believe that "government" is anything other than a gang of thugs with a fancy title."
If you wanted purity of the health freedom movement, we would need discipline about the scientific method and challenge the root of this vaccine and medical corruption.
That's not going to happen, but at least we are realizing that jabs are not the well of life that they claim them to be.
We're moving in the right direction.
Make truth cool again.
I agree with Emmanuel Garcia on Desmet and he's also correct that we can have a lovely world. "The revolution will not be televised!"
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
Great conversation, all it of, thanks. Re the 'extermination' of the American Indians, I think we use that word, but for those Indians still alive and well, it doesn't fit and perpetuates the idea that we killed them off. I think they beg to differ, as much as their culture was deciimated it was not entirely elimated. This link begins to speak to some of the American Indians more recent progress and achievments http://worldwithoutgenocide.org/genocides-and-conflicts/american-indian. I am not sure they agree with our assessment that they were exterminated, I think its a perpetuation of the myth. We were ALMOST successful, partially successful, so not successful.
Another excellent interview Tessa! On a similar note, my friend, Rob MyJob, wrote a song called "The Normal That Is New." I wrote about the video I made for that song here, absurdity reigns: https://sanefrancisco.substack.com/p/big-news-the-music-video-for-the
If we can't defend our rights, we don't have any rights.
I so enjoyed listening to this conversation. Thanks to you both. I felt a true kinship present while listening while working in my kitchen.😉🤗 Thank you so much!
In 2020, I coined the phrase 'The New Absurd' and never engendered laughs in public spaces. Like CJ Hopkins (but with less satirical talent) I stopped being funny in that same year.
Great conversation... Glad you brought up Steven Newcomb... (who rustled through the dialogue for half an hour prior to your mention) Thanks to you, I've read his magnificent 'Pagans in the Promised Land' and seen the documentary it gave rise to, and the sources mentioned in it. And though I might not have conceived of it as an "earlier reset", even before Newcomb I've always known this famous American Liberty was one side of the coin at best (Newcomb mentions this too, he mentions Benjamin Franklin's secret thoughts/letters).
And what a joy to hear Dr. Emanual Garcia speak... someone in the resistence who knows his Catullus, wow! I thought it'd never happen (Catullus as a sublime poet & as a stand-in for pre-Christian culture
- with it's own shadows, as Emanuel rightly remarks). Again, thank you so much!
Here in lackey Canada, we are more than just hewers of wood, and drawers of water, with our role in NORAD we provide space for the nukes shot out of the sky. At least a person who lives New Zealand will not be vaporized. Make sure you have some Prussian Blue and Lugol's Iodine on hand. I have a feeling the homeland is going to bring it home. I am wondering if they are dumbing down the psychiatrists, are they doing the same to psychologist?
The medicalization of psychiatry is NOT 'off to the side'. Before 1920, psychoanalysts were ANALYZING the varieties of humans in the same way that entomologists analyze the varieties of mosquitoes. After 1920, psychiatry joined the "enlightenment" view that all humans are identical passive particles, who can be modified in any direction by externally applied forces like chemicals.
If psychoANALYSTS had continued the old way of ANALYZING, we'd have more official and scientific recognition of the character of psychopaths. When we refuse to recognize the innate types of humans, we are unable to keep the bad types out of power.
The current monstrosity has only a slight 'off to the side' connection with microscopic pathogens. The monstrosity is entirely caused by giant psychopathogens.
i agree with Garcia, in that Desmet didn't fully appreciate the manufactured psychosis.
I am enjoying listening to this conversation (I am about half way through). I like your analogy about humanity being like an irresponsible teen age boy, beating his chest and saying "look at me i`m the best and i'm invincible" :) Thanks for sharing that one Tessa, it made me smile.
I like Dr. Emanuel Garcia as a person but I do not share his romanticized views of the "beautiful" ideals of 'democracy'.
In my opinion, Statism (what ever flavor it is , whether "democracy", "communism", "socialism", "fascism" or any other ism) is inherently immoral. I see all forms of involuntary governance (including 'democracy', not that we have ever had a real functioning democracy to begin with) as nothing more than glorified multi-generational crime cartels.
I do not accept violent coercion and involuntary governance as being a means to 'preserve freedom' or 'provide security' or any of the other propaganda lines we are fed, it is a means to enslave and a means for a small group of humans to feed on a larger group of humans, like parasites.
I agree with James Corbett when he said "No, I do not want better elections. I do not want to "clean up the system." I do not want to "get the money out of politics" and "make sure every vote is counted" and "drain the swamp" so we can "Make America [or any other geographical area] Great Again."
The state is not a benevolent force, despite what the most brainwashed of statists believe. It is not even a neutral tool that can be used for good or ill, as those who consider themselves pragmatists believe. It is violence. It is force. It is aggression. It is people believing that what is wrong for any individual to do is perfectly OK if an agent of the state does it.
If I steal, it is theft. If the state steals, it is taxation. If I kill, it is murder. If the state kills, it is warfare. If I force someone to work for me involuntarily, it is slavery. If the state does it, it is conscription. If I confine someone against their will, it is kidnapping. If the state does it, it is incarceration. Nothing has changed but the label.
What binds us to the state is the belief that there is a different morality for anything that has been sanctified through the political process. "Oh, 50%+1 of the population voted for forced vaccinations? Then I guess we have to comply." If you scoff at that sentence, how about if the vote were 100%-1? Would that change the morality of resistance? How about if forced vaccinations were mandated by the constitution? Then would you be compelled to submit?
Does the ballot box transform the unethical into the ethical? Of course not. But I'll tell you what it does do: It makes everyone who casts their ballot a part of the process that legitimizes the murder and violence committed by agents of the state.
No, I am not an efficiency manager for the state. I do not want to help it do its job of inflicting aggression and violence on peaceful people. I want the state to perish, not through violence or bloodshed, but by removing the mystical superstition from the minds of the general public that makes them believe that "government" is anything other than a gang of thugs with a fancy title."
My anthem of the medical freedom movement is dedicated to Dr. Garcia. Watch the hit music video FOREVER FREEDOM BRIGADE. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/forever-freedom-brigade
If you wanted purity of the health freedom movement, we would need discipline about the scientific method and challenge the root of this vaccine and medical corruption.
That's not going to happen, but at least we are realizing that jabs are not the well of life that they claim them to be.
We're moving in the right direction.
Make truth cool again.
I agree with Emmanuel Garcia on Desmet and he's also correct that we can have a lovely world. "The revolution will not be televised!"
https://plagueonbothhouses.com/were-we-hypnotised-by-desmet-part-i-where-does-his-argument-fall-apart/
This quote below is the reason why people hold onto lies instead of truth...
(From https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/alleged-cia-involvement-in-jfk-assassination-goes-mainstream-so-now-what/ )
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."