As they say, the difference between a conspiracy theory and reality is a few months to a few years.

I am sure that the fact checkers will come out and say that the study was taken out of context, or maybe the journal will take it down altogether—but in the meanwhile, you have probably seen this (and it disgusts me to cite it because it is cruel to experiment on unsuspecting people).

Also this (El Gato Malo comments on the part where is says “temporarily”):

bad cattitude

additional take on the israeli sperm count data

this is a follow up piece to this one: please read the 2 in conjunction. in the swarm-sourced research world, you never get to do all the smart things. you miss stuff and then, once you see it, say “a…

8 months ago · 435 likes · 133 comments · el gato malo

And I’ve written about this (the Comirnaty insert):

It is also soothing to know that an intentionally self-spreading variation of the shot is being trialed:

Unacceptable Jessica

When you hear BNT162c(2), run, don't walk, RUN away.

Please head to the document entitled: “INVESTIGATOR’S BROCHURE BNT162/PF-07302048” dated August 12, 2020. About half a year ago, I suppose, I virtually sat across from a Canadian researcher who was developing a new technology called self-amplifying RNA (saRNA). If you want, you can watch that interview…

8 months ago · 360 likes · 78 comments · Jessica Rose

We are in good hands. All is normal. Just a little Fourth Industrial Revolution here and there.

Jeez. We are ruled by the people who are not qualified to lead anyone anywhere because they are cray-cray, predatory, and don’t seem to relate to the rest of the human species.

But please keep mocking the open-minded conspiracy theorists. They are obviously the ones who don’t know what they are talking about, and could not have known this, and it’s all just a coincidence and “new data” “taken out of context.” And Pfizer loves us.

(Thank you for your support and kindness, I depend on it.)

Donate

Tessa Fights Robots

COVID Shots and Male Reproductive System…