I just posted a comment with Celia Farber's latest take on it, it is interesting.
As far as "Network," I think there are many parallels. The main character of the film was sincere and "meta" at the same time. He was sincere for a second, then show business immediately used his sincerity to feed the Machine, then he was not quite sincere anymore, then it felt not so amazing and he was sincere again, etc. etc. I think there are many, many parallels, including in the sign-off scenes (several of them).
Another note. Re Steve Kirsch's post re pro-vax PhDs:
From the UN ShareVerified Guide to Vaccine Communication. Collaborators include World Bank, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, etc
"...the group who is most likely to purposefully choose to not vaccinate are highly educated. In speaking with them, these are people who have read the primary literature themselves, & they’re correctly interpreting it, so it’s not a misunderstanding."
Talk about perjury. Thanks to Cory Morningstar for her work around this.
Firstly, Tessa, congratulations on your piece for Mercola. And talk about history repeating... it's almost unbelievable if it wasn't so chillingly clear. This is a long game, this Rockefeller creation of petrochemical Pharma and takeover of academia, but its profit from suffering is so overboard, so obvious now it's beyond medical care and gone into eugenics and genocide.
Re Pfizer's unwilling release of its horrendous crimes, from their document a blatant admission:
"Review of the available data for this cumulative PM [Post-Marketing] experience, confirms a favorable benefit:risk balance for BNT162b2."
I interpret that 'favorable' means the injuries and deaths from their product.
Lastly, I believe Brian Williams' speech is most certainly not a spoof. His honesty was tangible and his delivery direct to "the people". This felt a coded message as much as he could get away with, Network style. The Network clip feels more current than it's ever done. This is what we have to do. We have to take to the streets and let them know where we stand because we're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore!!
Margaret Anna, this is a great round-up, I remember it!!
Brian's sign-off is still mysterious to me. I can't quite figure it out. Allegedly, now, when he was talking about the "mob" he was talking about the "insurrection" etc.? I need to look deeper into it to make up my mind. But in any case, it seems the "meta" quality of it makes the parallels with "Network" really stand out.
Yeah, I saw Celia Farber’s subsequent post about this and am wondering myself. It’s like he specifically coded it so it could be read either way, depending on the audience’s biases ;-) Hmm …
Great comparison of the film "Network" to the Brian William's sign off. Absolutely surreal. Network is one of those rare films that predicted our future with such chilling accuracy that it is rather unnerving to think that it came out way back in 1976. Great work Tessa. Thank you.
Re the 1918 epidemic: the aspirin overdose hypothesis goes way back (familiar to me from homeopathic lore); the frequency idea is intriguing. Note also Denis Rancourt's allegation that 100+ years ago the role of a virus (if any) was eclipsed in significance by that played by bacterial lung infections that really caused the mass fatalities... another parallel, in his view, to the current psyop where antibiotic treatment of "covid" remains off-limits to (compliant) MDs, and (noncompliant) prescribers of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquin are actually making use of the lifesaving *antibacterial actions* of those meds against recent cases of bacterial pneumonia widely blamed on the "novel virus."
The COVID-19 pandemic has been one of fear, manufactured by individuals who were in the nominal positions of authority as the virus began to spread across the globe last year, according to Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch...
“Overall, I’d say that we’ve had a pandemic of fear. And fear has affected almost everybody, whereas the infection has affected relatively few,” said Risch.
“By and large, it’s been a very selected pandemic, and predictable. It was very distinguished between young versus old, healthy versus chronic disease people. So we quickly learned who was at risk for the pandemic and who wasn’t.
“However, the fear was manufactured for everybody. And that’s what’s characterized the whole pandemic is that degree of fear and people’s response to the fear.”
Actually, no death from Omicron has been reported anywhere in the world, unlike all of the "vaccines".
The new omicron variant has the potential to fuel almost 75,000 deaths in England this winter, according to the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Yet out of more than 700 omicron cases detected in Europe, no deaths or serious illnesses have been reported so far, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control said.
If vaccines cause net harms, are being deployed worldwide, and every vaccine failure just leads to more vaccination, then this situation is best understood as a genocide.
Aww, this always happened before, forever. It's just that the cameras were never on the athletes when they died on the field of heart attacks until this year.
No, everybody wants to blame vaccines, but these guys are dying from not seeing their doctors for a year and eating junk food, like everybody else. (Thanks Noirette)
...On November 26, WHO designated B.1.1.529 as a variant of concern (3), as did the U.S. SARS-CoV-2 Interagency Group (SIG)* on November 30. On December 1, the first case of COVID-19 attributed to the Omicron variant was reported in the United States. As of December 8, a total of 22 states had identified at least one Omicron variant case, including some that indicate community transmission. Among 43 cases with initial follow-up, one hospitalization and no deaths were reported.
COVID infection of fat cells is bad, if you have a lot of them. It leads to a whole lot of inflammation, and can last a lot longer, with the virus dug-in deeply.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the viral pathogen SARS-CoV-2, has taken the lives of millions of individuals around the world. Obesity is associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. In this report, we demonstrate that human adipose tissue from multiple depots is permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection and that infection elicits an inflammatory response, including the secretion of known inflammatory mediators of severe COVID-19. We identify two cellular targets of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adipose tissue: mature adipocytes and adipose tissue macrophages. Adipose tissue macrophage infection is largely restricted to a highly inflammatory subpopulation of macrophages, present at baseline, that is further activated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Preadipocytes, while not infected, adopt a proinflammatory phenotype. We further demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 RNA is detectable in adipocytes in COVID-19 autopsy cases and is associated with an inflammatory infiltrate. Collectively, our findings indicate that adipose tissue supports SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenic inflammation and may explain the link between obesity and severe COVID-19.
One sentence summary Our work provides the first in vivo evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human adipose tissue and describes the associated inflammation.
I have long wondered how these "units" of vitamin-D were derived.
Yes, the Israeli study shows the cutt-off for risk of COVID death is pretty marked at deficient vitamin-D level of 20 ng/mL, and essentially nobody dies with a level over 40 mg/mL. I think 60-100 ng/mL is the ideal level, myself. David Grimes MD:
I have indicated previously that by definition and before the days of physical measurement, one unit of Vitamin D was defined as the daily requirement of a 10 gram immature mouse. We can scale up from that so that the daily requirement of a 60kg human would be 6,000 units, and for a 120kg obese human 12,000 units each day. To be cautious, perhaps half of these doses would be a reasonable starting point for determining the dose that would be appropriate in achieving the blood levels of 40ng/ml, 100nmol/L. This must be the target level, as the study from Israel indicates.
"Please read between the lines here, folks. I'd say what I really want to say, if only I could."
We don't see what he sees: A cadre of msm mobster thugs in sunglasses standing off-camera, blocking the exits ready to throttle him if he says anything "out of line".
Once he is out of the limelight for a while and feeling somewhat safe, perhaps we'll hear him actually speak his mind?
The way I understood that line, I thought he was referring to himself. Perhaps he volunteers with the fire department? But I didn't look into it, I could be wrong.
The 1918 "Spanish flu" was caused by inoculations at the time....
https://epidemiologyexplained.com/the-spanish-flu-was-neither-spanish-nor-flu-bombshell-or-atomic-bombshell/
Also it's examined in the book virus mania.
Thank you, and a good book!
Brian is not upset at the state of the nation that we see.
He's upset at the state of the nation for the system
I don't get why he gets compared to the movie network.
This is nothing like that movie.
I just posted a comment with Celia Farber's latest take on it, it is interesting.
As far as "Network," I think there are many parallels. The main character of the film was sincere and "meta" at the same time. He was sincere for a second, then show business immediately used his sincerity to feed the Machine, then he was not quite sincere anymore, then it felt not so amazing and he was sincere again, etc. etc. I think there are many, many parallels, including in the sign-off scenes (several of them).
Another note. Re Steve Kirsch's post re pro-vax PhDs:
From the UN ShareVerified Guide to Vaccine Communication. Collaborators include World Bank, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, etc
"...the group who is most likely to purposefully choose to not vaccinate are highly educated. In speaking with them, these are people who have read the primary literature themselves, & they’re correctly interpreting it, so it’s not a misunderstanding."
Talk about perjury. Thanks to Cory Morningstar for her work around this.
https://mobile.twitter.com/elleprovocateur/status/1329636347221598209
Funny that being open and honest about risks and benefits is never part of the message.
Thank you for sharing it, and yes, Cory is magnificent!!
If I recall, you're in NYC? Is there much resistance to the new season of pandemic horror theater?
Firstly, Tessa, congratulations on your piece for Mercola. And talk about history repeating... it's almost unbelievable if it wasn't so chillingly clear. This is a long game, this Rockefeller creation of petrochemical Pharma and takeover of academia, but its profit from suffering is so overboard, so obvious now it's beyond medical care and gone into eugenics and genocide.
Re Pfizer's unwilling release of its horrendous crimes, from their document a blatant admission:
"Review of the available data for this cumulative PM [Post-Marketing] experience, confirms a favorable benefit:risk balance for BNT162b2."
I interpret that 'favorable' means the injuries and deaths from their product.
Lastly, I believe Brian Williams' speech is most certainly not a spoof. His honesty was tangible and his delivery direct to "the people". This felt a coded message as much as he could get away with, Network style. The Network clip feels more current than it's ever done. This is what we have to do. We have to take to the streets and let them know where we stand because we're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore!!
Let us all fight the robots together.
WOW—that Brian Williams clip gave me chills! I am amazed at his bravery!
I feel “Network” is so vital, I featured it in my first Recommendations Roundup: https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/recommendations-roundup-1-predicting
Margaret Anna, this is a great round-up, I remember it!!
Brian's sign-off is still mysterious to me. I can't quite figure it out. Allegedly, now, when he was talking about the "mob" he was talking about the "insurrection" etc.? I need to look deeper into it to make up my mind. But in any case, it seems the "meta" quality of it makes the parallels with "Network" really stand out.
Yeah, I saw Celia Farber’s subsequent post about this and am wondering myself. It’s like he specifically coded it so it could be read either way, depending on the audience’s biases ;-) Hmm …
Great comparison of the film "Network" to the Brian William's sign off. Absolutely surreal. Network is one of those rare films that predicted our future with such chilling accuracy that it is rather unnerving to think that it came out way back in 1976. Great work Tessa. Thank you.
Re the 1918 epidemic: the aspirin overdose hypothesis goes way back (familiar to me from homeopathic lore); the frequency idea is intriguing. Note also Denis Rancourt's allegation that 100+ years ago the role of a virus (if any) was eclipsed in significance by that played by bacterial lung infections that really caused the mass fatalities... another parallel, in his view, to the current psyop where antibiotic treatment of "covid" remains off-limits to (compliant) MDs, and (noncompliant) prescribers of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquin are actually making use of the lifesaving *antibacterial actions* of those meds against recent cases of bacterial pneumonia widely blamed on the "novel virus."
There are also pictures of the rural homestead house-addition we are building, spending the "retirement" from my firing for non-vaccination from the clinic where I worked 18 years here https://www.johndayblog.com/2021/12/proactive-not-fearful.html
The COVID-19 pandemic has been one of fear, manufactured by individuals who were in the nominal positions of authority as the virus began to spread across the globe last year, according to Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch...
“Overall, I’d say that we’ve had a pandemic of fear. And fear has affected almost everybody, whereas the infection has affected relatively few,” said Risch.
“By and large, it’s been a very selected pandemic, and predictable. It was very distinguished between young versus old, healthy versus chronic disease people. So we quickly learned who was at risk for the pandemic and who wasn’t.
“However, the fear was manufactured for everybody. And that’s what’s characterized the whole pandemic is that degree of fear and people’s response to the fear.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/covid-19-pandemic-fear-manufactured-authorities-yale-epidemiologist
Actually, no death from Omicron has been reported anywhere in the world, unlike all of the "vaccines".
The new omicron variant has the potential to fuel almost 75,000 deaths in England this winter, according to the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Yet out of more than 700 omicron cases detected in Europe, no deaths or serious illnesses have been reported so far, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-11/u-s-outbreak-worsens-no-omicron-deaths-in-eu-virus-update
None dare call it, er... this word, here:
If vaccines cause net harms, are being deployed worldwide, and every vaccine failure just leads to more vaccination, then this situation is best understood as a genocide.
https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-geographies-of-the-pharma-genocide
303 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 175 Dead, After COVID Shot
Aww, this always happened before, forever. It's just that the cameras were never on the athletes when they died on the field of heart attacks until this year.
No, everybody wants to blame vaccines, but these guys are dying from not seeing their doctors for a year and eating junk food, like everybody else. (Thanks Noirette)
https://goodsciencing.com/covid/71-athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-26-die-after-covid-shot/
...On November 26, WHO designated B.1.1.529 as a variant of concern (3), as did the U.S. SARS-CoV-2 Interagency Group (SIG)* on November 30. On December 1, the first case of COVID-19 attributed to the Omicron variant was reported in the United States. As of December 8, a total of 22 states had identified at least one Omicron variant case, including some that indicate community transmission. Among 43 cases with initial follow-up, one hospitalization and no deaths were reported.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7050e1.htm?s_cid=mm7050e1_w
COVID infection of fat cells is bad, if you have a lot of them. It leads to a whole lot of inflammation, and can last a lot longer, with the virus dug-in deeply.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the viral pathogen SARS-CoV-2, has taken the lives of millions of individuals around the world. Obesity is associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. In this report, we demonstrate that human adipose tissue from multiple depots is permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection and that infection elicits an inflammatory response, including the secretion of known inflammatory mediators of severe COVID-19. We identify two cellular targets of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adipose tissue: mature adipocytes and adipose tissue macrophages. Adipose tissue macrophage infection is largely restricted to a highly inflammatory subpopulation of macrophages, present at baseline, that is further activated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Preadipocytes, while not infected, adopt a proinflammatory phenotype. We further demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 RNA is detectable in adipocytes in COVID-19 autopsy cases and is associated with an inflammatory infiltrate. Collectively, our findings indicate that adipose tissue supports SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenic inflammation and may explain the link between obesity and severe COVID-19.
One sentence summary Our work provides the first in vivo evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human adipose tissue and describes the associated inflammation.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.24.465626v1.full
I have long wondered how these "units" of vitamin-D were derived.
Yes, the Israeli study shows the cutt-off for risk of COVID death is pretty marked at deficient vitamin-D level of 20 ng/mL, and essentially nobody dies with a level over 40 mg/mL. I think 60-100 ng/mL is the ideal level, myself. David Grimes MD:
I have indicated previously that by definition and before the days of physical measurement, one unit of Vitamin D was defined as the daily requirement of a 10 gram immature mouse. We can scale up from that so that the daily requirement of a 60kg human would be 6,000 units, and for a 120kg obese human 12,000 units each day. To be cautious, perhaps half of these doses would be a reasonable starting point for determining the dose that would be appropriate in achieving the blood levels of 40ng/ml, 100nmol/L. This must be the target level, as the study from Israel indicates.
http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/
Interesting commentary by Celia Farber about Brian Williams' sign-off.
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/it-seems-i-was-wrong-to-think-brian
Forgot to add this a new one, not the one included in my article. It is Celia;s revision of her original take.
Re: Brian Williams Sign-Off
"Please read between the lines here, folks. I'd say what I really want to say, if only I could."
We don't see what he sees: A cadre of msm mobster thugs in sunglasses standing off-camera, blocking the exits ready to throttle him if he says anything "out of line".
Once he is out of the limelight for a while and feeling somewhat safe, perhaps we'll hear him actually speak his mind?
What volunteer fireman is he talking about? Does anyone have a link to that?
The way I understood that line, I thought he was referring to himself. Perhaps he volunteers with the fire department? But I didn't look into it, I could be wrong.
that makes sense now.