Who Is the Terrorist?
No, really.
You have probably seen the terrorism advisory that the DHS issued on February 7:
And, granted, interpreting bureaucratic language is an art of its own—as they like to sound dramatic to increase their funding and general glory—but in the current environment, this sounds like a formal attack on free speech, and it is entirely unAmerican, if we are to take the “American values of democracy and free expression" at face value. (And yes, it’s healthy to snap out of the 2022 “standards” and remember 2019 and the original Normal, imperfect as it was.)
It is now an act of terrorism to scrutinize or criticize government policies or pharmaceutical products made by a private company?
Is it an act of terrorism to expose or decry the corruption of regulatory agencies?
Where, in the proverbial North Korea, or here in America?
Oh my.
A Russian Brezhnev era joke comes to mind:
A Russian asks an American: “So when you say Americans are free, what do you mean?” “Well, in America, you are free to walk up to the White House and say, “Reagan sucks!” “So what,” says the Russian. “We here can walk up to the Kremlin and say, ‘Reagan sucks!’”
So in that spirit, let me ask, who is the terrorist here?
Here is a list of a few potential candidates, please make your pick.
- People who don’t quite trust the pharmaceutical industry
- Activists advocating for protecting the American citizens from corporate fraud or government overreach
- Legal and medical experts who believe that the official data is cooked and demand an investigation
- Lawyers suing government agencies over COVID injection mandates
- Citizens who believe that the U.S. Constitution is legally binding
- Medical doctors who have successfully treated thousands of COVID patients and who are now trying to share their experience
- Medical doctors who have seen a lot of adverse reactions to COVID injections in their patients, and who feel morally obligated to speak up
- Journalists who do actual journalism
- Individuals who have sponsored, supported, promoted, and then covered up the gain-of-function research that likely resulted in the artifact of synthetic biology that we got to know as “SARS-CoV-2” (including the individuals identifying as “the science”)
- Teams of people in different influential positions who have developed and pushed through a campaign of terrorizing American citizens with 24/7 wall-to-wall advertisements of paralyzing fear, and who have been shaming people for things like coming close to their parents or hugging their kids
- People in positions of power who have made sure that COVID patients are not treated with anything until they can barely breathe—and then get “treated” strictly with things that don’t work
- Medical boards revoking the licenses of doctors who have deviated from using strictly the things that don’t work to treat their COVID patients
- Certain governors who have obliged nursing homes to take active COVID patients
- Hospital staff who let COVID patients rot in isolation—often unattended and sometimes unfed—and who did not allow family members to come in and check on their loved ones
Hospitals staff who sadistically refused to dispense medications that the patients and their families desperately begged for, even though said medications had been prescribed by their primary physicians
- People at Pfizer who have seemingly cooked their trial and clinical data
- People in official positions who “la la la” everyone over thousands and thousands of reported adverse reactions and deaths in very close temporal proximity to COVID injections, even though it is their direct professional duty to investigate every such case to make sure that the product doesn’t need to be recalled
- People who mandated masks on toddlers’ faces even though toddlers are known to be at a low risk from COVID and at a high risk of decreased cognitive and emotional development due to masks
- People who printed so much money (for the enrichment of the already super rich) that if this entire thing doesn’t collapse, it’ll be a miracle of nature
I don’t know about you but to me it seems like the people at the top of the list aren’t terrorists.
I’d like to end this story with a reference to an article that I wrote earlier about the anatomy of deceit and “pandemic terrorism.” Because it’s not the dissidents who have been terrorizing us, it’s been… the other ones.
Excellent summary of state terrorism toward the demos. I love those old Soviet jokes. Please keep them coming. There's two party officials just after the fall, one says "have you noticed that everything they told us about communism was false?" The other responds, "Yes but that's not the worst thing, what's worse now is that everything they told us about capitalism is true."
I'm not a terrorist. I practiceahimsa", non-violence. I don't eat animals, for instance.
I might be a "terrorist" these days, or maybe moving up the ranks towards it...
https://www.johndayblog.com/2022/02/decertification-proceedings.html Sunday afternoon when we got back to Austin from working on the Yoakum homestead there was an envelope from the American Board of Family Medicine.
I have been certified by this board for 31 years. I have a recertification test coming up in April, and have met all of the extensive and costly requirements to maintain certification, which include paying for and doing many weeks of their own costly medical education in the past decades, as well as extensive self study.
Half of that continuing-education credit is provided by medical services that I pay for and half is self study.
Last summer, having extensively studied and documented COVID since late 2019, I sent the board a blog link to point out how much research on COVID I had continuously done, which was unsurprisingly was not accepted as proof of self study. Subsequent to that I laboriously entered citations for 150 COVID-19 treatment studies, claiming one hour of credit each, which was accepted.
The "Letter of Concern" states that the Board did look at my blog, and I stand accused of "denigrating vaccination for COVID-19, discouraging the public from being vaccinated, and spreading other misinformation about the virus publicly, including that the vaccine itself contributes to causing COVID-19 infections and death".
Well, except for the word "misinformation", which should have the first 3 letters removed, I don't dispute that statement.
In my reply I pointed out the deaths and serious adverse reactions caused by the genetic therapy "vaccines" available in the US and Europe, and also pointed out that the "negative efficacy" well documented since last summer in UK data, reflects "ADE", antibody dependent enhancement of viral pathogenicity, caused by the antibodies formed to the original January 2020 spike protein. I also pointed out that in children and young adults the dangers of these treatments clearly outweigh even short term protective benefits, so these people should not be subjected to these treatments in any case.
At the end of my (fairly neatly handwritten) letter, I requested that if the Board decides to decertify me, that I be refunded my full testing fee, which I paid last September. My first guess is that they will find a way to keep the fee and also to add me to their list of sanctioned and decertified non-compliant doctors.
We'll know by mid April, I guess. I'll post updates.