People Suing State Governments for "Climate Change": Three Cases to be Heard This Week by European Court of Human Rights

"The rulings of the panel of 17 judges will not be able to be appealed."

We are living in such fantastical times. When the very mighty masters upstairs want the money to flow into their pockets in a particular way, and when they want the peasants back in a humble place, they encourage absurd ideas, such as people suing countries for “climate change.”

There are so many ways in which nature is being abused—to the masters’ horn and on their command—but no, “very scary climate change.”

Ecowatch reports:

This week, the European Court of Human Rights could make a landmark ruling that governments have an obligation to protect people from the adverse impacts of climate change. [Translation from Orwellian to English: we are looking at a symbolic justification of the totalitarian mindset and an opportunity for the “servants of the people” to abuse their citizens a little more in the name of “climate change”]

Judges will rule on three distinct cases concerning whether people’s human rights were breached when governments failed to protect them from the ravages of a warming planet.

“We all are trying to achieve the same goal,” said Catarina Mota, a 23-year-old plaintiff in one of the cases, as Reuters reported. “A win in any one of the three cases will be a win for everyone.”

One of the cases — Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland — concerns a complaint brought by members of a Swiss association of older women who are concerned about the impacts of global heating on their health and living conditions, the European Court of Human Rights said in a press release.

The group of women claim that Bern’s failure to reduce emissions that aligns with a pathway to limit global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius was in breach of their right to life, reported Reuters.

They cited a report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that found older adults and women were some of those most at risk of death from extreme temperatures during heat waves.

Attorneys for the women are looking for a decision that could compel Switzerland to pick up the pace of its carbon emissions reductions.

Another of the cases — Carême v. France — involves a former mayor of the city of Grande-Synthe who says France has not taken enough action to prevent global heating, which equates to a violation of “the right to respect for private and family life” and “the right to life,” the press release said.

In a third case — Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Others — plaintiffs say current and future climate change impacts are the responsibility of states and affect their well-being, mental health and “the peaceful enjoyment of their homes.”

“The three cases are quite distinct in terms of who’s bringing the case, which government or governments is being sued, and what the ask is in the case,” said Lucy Maxwell, Climate Litigation Network’s co-director, as Reuters reported.

The rulings of the panel of 17 judges will not be able to be appealed.

And here is a report on this revolutionary development in the “news,” narrated very appropriately by an AI voice:

How disgusting it is to scare and seduce the children with “horrifying climate change” while they are being actually hurt by the masters in a thousand different ways that actually need to be opposed!

My hat goes off to the parents who guard their children’s hearts and minds as much as they humanly can, even as the people with not-so-good intentions are trying to confuse and vampire both the children and the adults. They, the parents raising children in “interesting times,” are the real heroes of the day. May they succeed.

---

A note to readers: If you are in the position to do so, I very much encourage you to become a paid subscriber or donate. I love you in any case, but it helps A LOT, and I am in a dire need to get more donations and paid subscribers while keeping my posts free. Thank you from my heart for your support!