53 Comments

so only 10% or 1 in 10 doctors have retained their critical thinking skills after pharma based doctor training. yet how many of this 10% actually have the courage to speak up? i would think that must be down in the 1% range

Expand full comment

Great roundup, thank you!

Expand full comment

Thanks Tessa! I think we should add to our list of concerns the trajectory of climate (pseudo)science and how this intersects with what else is happening today. I've written about it here: https://jimreagen.substack.com/p/global-warming?s=w

Teilhard de Chardin wrote about the "noosphere," or the planetary mind, and I've lately been thinking about how this is a deeply conditioned, rather than a natural (think zen) mind. Our noosphere is becoming constricted by fear; in my view, the theory of global warming is part of how that fear is generated. Biolab pathogens supposedly emerging due to a warming world would contribute to that conditioning. What kinds of targeted pathogens might emerge twenty years from now?

You don't suppose that anyone has ever thought of conditioning the noosphere, do you? In order to be able to manage it?

Expand full comment

May Chas NEVER sit on any throne other than a porcelain throne. NO respect.

Expand full comment

What is the possibility or likelihood that the instance of vaccine hesitancy among doctors is much higher than reported in the survey, but that far too many who are hesitant are reluctant to say so? We know that people lie when replying to surveys; honestly, it's difficult or impossible to know the truth, especially from survey data.

Expand full comment
Apr 20, 2022·edited Apr 20, 2022Liked by Tessa Lena

A friend of mine went to her heart specialist. When they were alone, he whispered, did you take the jab? she said no and I won't. He said, neither did I and many of my colleagues did not either. Do not take them, they will kill you.

I hope to find out which doctors hereabouts did not take them. I would prefer to go there.

Your video is hilarious ! I think most people are relieved. Even a needle happy friend is no longer wearing one. Hurray, back to normal. Back to the germs !

There are good germs and bad germs you know. If you try to kill or avoid the bad ones, you also avoid the good ones. Even more so.

As to Charles, he is one of these people who are living in their own world, just like the Gates's of this world. They don't know anything about real life and think probably they are doing good, but they are eugenists, to regular people that means criminals. You have to give people a choice. The moment you take away that choice (vaxx or no vaxx f. i. ) you are a criminal, because you break the Constitution laws.

Expand full comment
Apr 20, 2022Liked by Tessa Lena

and cancers... all over the place, out of a blue, small ones (for now), in places like skin, bladder, breast cancer rapidly... and what was that story with Hailey Biber getting a brain clot?

Expand full comment

language?

Vaccine hesitancy is an accusation. No one chooses to be "vaccine hesitant." No-one claims to be "vaccine hesitant." People can choose to reject any or all vaccinations, that's "vaccine choice", not "vaccine hesitancy." Be a vaccine chooser. Choosing to NOT be vaccinated is a vaccine choice, not vaccine hesitancy.

Expand full comment

Some great stories you won't find in the corporate media. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I feel bad for that airline pilot. He says his career is probably over and he won't get to teach his daughter how to fly an airplane. 😕

Expand full comment
Apr 20, 2022·edited Apr 20, 2022Liked by Tessa Lena

Is a "collection of news" the correct collective noun? I searched; but I found nothing specific on it.

From what I read, a collective noun is somehow related to the thing, animal or people in some way.

I suggest the following as collective nouns for news:

1. Broadcast

2. Gaggle (the collective noun for journalists is a gaggle)

Expand full comment
Apr 20, 2022Liked by Tessa Lena

you should recycle those old stories - they validate you. speaking of validation, thought you might want to see ivor cummins' retrospective of his sept 2020 analysis of lockdown insanity - history has proven team humanity correct: https://www.bitchute.com/video/SMERAR4ieLj2/

i got this from mark crispin miller's list

btw you have a "s" in "instruction manual" in your last sentence (i still have my proofreader hat on at this late hour)

Expand full comment

#6 smells like the same putrid BS that is endlessly uttered by Big Harma and the "medical establishment".

Expand full comment

But my BIG concern is ending 'the great reset' begun by the 'royal family',

the same one that owns 93% of all the land in Canada. OWNS.

Expand full comment

One thing I'm noticing is a)lack of planning or b) understanding, ie. educated DOCTORS did not understand they had to plan to take on the establishment. The elites, top people do something the rest don't do and must do to not only win but SURVIVE. We call it COLLUSION when the top people band together (it's HOW they do it!), but all the rest of us must BAND together to EVER take on these powers. No single Whistleblowers.

So easy to target and destroy.

No individual doctors. Of COURSE they ruin them. I'd say 4, FOUR doctors working together. And savvy with YouTube or blogging, rumble etc.

Someone in the group knows. Someone plans it out.

And until then, you just have to lay low. Or you lose, many others lose because they lose YOU.

Yes, you lose some: it's a war. Extensive records, charts are locked somewhere for later. Unobtrusive autopsies done but nothing said.

Same as any war.

Expand full comment

I am as concerned as anyone about the Great Reset, but calm myself listening to astrologers & others who say it will fail, partly out of its own delusions and partly because the people will not have it. It's at least caused by our times (centralization of power, digitization) but our times are more unpredictable than their control grids allow for.

Expand full comment